Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Reactions are here - update from MNHQ

238 replies

KatyMumsnet · 18/12/2024 14:10

We’ve listened to your feedback! While many of you have enjoyed the ‘Thanks’ button, you also told us that you'd love more ways to express your feelings on the site.

Starting today, you now have the choice of four reactions:
‘Agree’, ‘Love’, ‘Funny’, and ‘Thanks’.

Here’s how it works:

  • Select the ‘React’ button underneath the OP or reply.
  • Choose the reaction that reflects how you feel about the post.
  • Reactions are private and are only visible to the post owner.
  • You can select one reaction per post.

We hope this gives you even more ways to engage with posts and share how you feel.

Let us know your thoughts or any questions in the comments below!

OP posts:
slightlydistrac · 18/12/2024 15:25

Cannotorwillnot · 18/12/2024 14:40

They look childish.

I agree about the need for something to show agreement but it makes Thanks and Love unnecessary. And why not something to show disagreement too? That could prevent a lot of nasty bickering. I would prefer a simple choice of Upvote or Downvote, and the ability for everyone to see the numbers of each (and the names if they wanted to). It would be good to know how many people agreed with each post I read.

(Incidentally, I hope the counting becomes more accurate. I frequently get emails telling me how many people have thanked me for a particular post, but then discover that the number shown on the post itself is, and remains, completely different.)

Edited

I found that too, it seems to tell you how many there are on all your posts on that particular thread, not your individual posts within it. Unless you only posted the OP and nothing else, it wasn't particularly helpful.

DrSpartacular · 18/12/2024 15:27

Could they not at least have been MN emojis?

ItOnlyTakesTwoMinutes · 18/12/2024 15:28

RoadToBeverly · 18/12/2024 14:14

But people will use the Laugh emoji to laugh at posts that aren't supposed to be funny in a bitchy way, as happens on Facebook. I think you should remove that one.

I agree with this.

Kangarude · 18/12/2024 15:31

Sent you a reaction @EmeraldRoulette

UndeniablyGenX · 18/12/2024 15:33

I like them - 'thanks' didn't always feel like an accurate reaction; also like that the reactions you've received are more visible now on your posts.

Only feedback - is there any reason why we can't give more than one reaction to a post?

AngelontopoftheTree · 18/12/2024 15:33

BoreOfWhabylon · 18/12/2024 14:35

Indeed @RegimentalSturgeon
(I have handclapped your post, in genuine agreement)

I thought hand clap 👏 is for Thanks, and thumbs up 👍 is for agree...... are we all going to be using them differently?

@janejeffer I've "thanked" you on this thread - can you see it?

Essentialblindspots · 18/12/2024 15:33

VictorianScreenTime · 18/12/2024 14:18

Ooh. I’m conflicted. I like the flexibility of more options but I felt the “thanks” was like a subtle but meaningful hand squeeze/head nod. I think it was more restrained and therefore more effective.

Ooh I didn’t realise it was meant to be a restrained hand squeeze or head nod!
I like the sound of that!

Tbh, I never quite understood if thanks meant “literally” thanks, or if it meant “like”, so I hesitated to use it.

I think that was the fundamental problem with it really.

I’d use thanks if op or another pp addressed me personally saying “you hit the nail on the head thanks for the advice” or something like that, but I wouldn’t use it if a pp just happened to write something I very much agreed with, because to me it would feel a bit awkward saying thank you for something that was addressed to everyone. Even though I wanted to ifyswim!

But I over-think these things massively 😄😬😬

RoadToBeverly · 18/12/2024 15:34

TheChippendenSpook · 18/12/2024 15:06

Because people just like to moan for the sake of it.

You are the one moaning. People are expressing their opinions on a thread about emojis

HysteroscopyWoes · 18/12/2024 15:34

I’d love to know the breakdown on the length of time MNers have been MNers, and the feedback answers (if that makes sense!)

As a very long term MNer, I’ll be honest and my first thought after reading (and I’m genuinely sorry @KatyMumsnet, this really isn’t meant as a personal attack on you Grin) I read “we’ve listened to your feedback…you want more emojis to express your feelings” and my first thought is

oh fuck off
Blush

Mind you, I’m with @Fabulouslyunfabulous in that I think using any emoji other than MN supplied ones, is BU Xmas Wink And it took me ages to stop using Mumsnet Classic layout on my desktop PS, so I accept I’m just an old school dinosaur. Meh. Fuck it.

(and the Beta app is still shit and you can’t even see half the options so…)

snowyglobe · 18/12/2024 15:34

ABunchOfBadBitches · 18/12/2024 15:10

Genuine question - how old are you? My grandma is 71 and she’d be able to figure out which icon is which.

The hand clapping is ‘thanks.’ The thumbs up is ‘agree.’ The laughing face is very obviously ‘funny’ and the heart is obviously ‘love.’ You can also click on them and it’ll tell you which is which after you’ve pressed it…

I’m in my 40s, I work in UX design and I don’t think it’s obvious that clapping means thanks.

VimesandhisCardboardBoots · 18/12/2024 15:35

Not a fan of this at all.

Thanks was good. It was a single click, it did the job, and had very little potential for using it to be mean to people.

UndeniablyGenX · 18/12/2024 15:36

I’d love to know the breakdown on the length of time MNers have been MNers, and the feedback answers (if that makes sense!)

Been here about nine years now and I like them.

DappledThings · 18/12/2024 15:37

UndeniablyGenX · 18/12/2024 15:36

I’d love to know the breakdown on the length of time MNers have been MNers, and the feedback answers (if that makes sense!)

Been here about nine years now and I like them.

About 10 for me I think and I like them too.

RoadToBeverly · 18/12/2024 15:37

There you go, already had a "bitchy giggler" emoji on a post. Point proven

Reactions are here - update from MNHQ
RoadToBeverly · 18/12/2024 15:38

Just the thanks was good. No issues with that.

DappledThings · 18/12/2024 15:38

RoadToBeverly · 18/12/2024 15:37

There you go, already had a "bitchy giggler" emoji on a post. Point proven

I don't think that's particularly bitchy.

EmeraldRoulette · 18/12/2024 15:40

Thanks to everyone who reacted to my post 😊

LoremIpsumCici · 18/12/2024 15:41

AlbertCamusflage · 18/12/2024 14:34

Nice in principle, but the options seem to be:

  1. Tribal harrumph of approval
  2. Yeah ok.
  3. Aww hun xxx
  4. You are ridiculous.

All a bit harsh and parodical compared with the gentle 'thanks' option.

This. I don’t see this as an improvement.

RoadToBeverly · 18/12/2024 15:42

DappledThings · 18/12/2024 15:38

I don't think that's particularly bitchy.

I disagree. Laughing at a post the poster didn't intend to be funny is bitchy. You see it on Facebook a lot.

SanFranByAir · 18/12/2024 15:44

Unsure. I felt thanks didn't fit many situations, just thanking someone for replying to my query. The laugh emoji is nice to show you've appreciated someone's humour, but as a pp mentioned it can be misused in the FB sense. The thumbs up, yeah time saving.
Glad there isn't an angry as the trolls will mine those. I'm not enthusiastic and upbeat enough for the clap (probably could have phrased that better).
We shall see.

FearOfTheDucks · 18/12/2024 15:48

I don't object to the idea of different reactions in principle but I think the laughing one is a bad idea. People will be using it mockingly, especially given how polarised discussion on MN can get. Using it to indicate that they think someone's political or religious view is laughable, for instance, or that they don't believe someone's anecdote. I think it'll be detrimental to the tone of the site.

RoadToBeverly · 18/12/2024 15:49

FearOfTheDucks · 18/12/2024 15:48

I don't object to the idea of different reactions in principle but I think the laughing one is a bad idea. People will be using it mockingly, especially given how polarised discussion on MN can get. Using it to indicate that they think someone's political or religious view is laughable, for instance, or that they don't believe someone's anecdote. I think it'll be detrimental to the tone of the site.

I agree

TomatoAuberginePotatoTurnip · 18/12/2024 15:51

Maybe just a '✔' for agree would have been enough as well as the thanks.

The others will make the site too facebooky

UndeniablyGenX · 18/12/2024 15:51

RoadToBeverly · 18/12/2024 15:42

I disagree. Laughing at a post the poster didn't intend to be funny is bitchy. You see it on Facebook a lot.

But if people want to do that, they can already quote and post a 😂emoji, which is public.

Nothatgingerpirate · 18/12/2024 16:02

I like the heart ❤️ button as well, however, not one disagreement emoji!
Noticed in another thread, comments that didn't express direct support to the OP or take their side got deleted.
(A guy whose girlfriend got physical under influence).