Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Site stuff

Join our Innovation Panel to try new features early and help make Mumsnet better.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Thoughts on MNHQ's response to the Spartacus thread

991 replies

OlennasWimple · 30/08/2016 22:23

As the Spartacus thread is about to reach capacity, here's a new thread to discuss MNHQ's response to the issues raised on that thread and in a few other places over the last week or so.

is lesphobic to insist that a lesbian likes penis. Feck off with that shite.
Add message | Report | Message poster KateMumsnet (MNHQ) Tue 30-Aug-16 21:08:00
Hello all

Thanks for all your input on this - we've been listening and thinking hard.

Couple of quick points to clear up: it's actually not the case that people have been banned solely for misgendering - it will have been part of a broader discussion here about whether that poster is able to stick to the rules generally.

We must admit to being slightly taken aback at being cast, by some, as the evil slave-baiting Roman republic in this grin - as lots of you have pointed out, Mumsnet remains one of the few places where these issues can be discussed at all. It would have been much, much easier (both in terms of the resource and the toll on our moderators' sanity!) to shut down the debate as others have done, but instead we are working hard to find a realistic balance between free speech and being a space which welcomes everyone.

From our perspective, the whole issue is pretty much covered by our Talk Guidelines. If people are using sex-at-birth pronouns to provoke, inflame, or belittle, then that's against the rules and will usually have to go. If it happens as part of an otherwise broadly respectful (even if heated) discussion, we look at it in that context and take a view.

Some of you have pointed out a disjunct between allowing posts which mirror mainstream scientific thinking, while asking MNers not to describe a trans woman as 'he'. We can see your point on this,and also accept that there is a fair amount of dodgy stuff on the trans side that can rightly be described as anti-feminist and regressive - but what we'd ask you to think about is the impact on the parent who's not an activist, and likely isn't even posting, but whose adult child is transitioning, or who is doing so themselves. Would they feel belittled, mocked or attacked? Would they think Mumsnet was not for them? If so, we're going to have to remove it. It's a fudge, but it's the best we can do at this stage.

In all but the most extreme headline-grabbing cases, we do think it's possible to debate the core principles without referring to individuals in a way which will cause hurt. Most of you have said that when talking to a trans person face-to-face you wouldn't insist on using birth pronouns or names - and generally, on this and other issues, we encourage people to treat others with the same courtesy they'd use in real life. For every MNer who posts on a thread there are likely to be ten who are lurking - statistically, some of those will be trans or love someone who is, and we need to take account of them too.

We hope that makes our thinking a bit clearer overall. Do continue to tell us your thoughts - it's probably unrealistic to think that this issue will be quickly resolved here or across society as a whole, but it would be brilliant if MN could be part of the solution, we think.

MNHQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
19
DropYourSword · 02/09/2016 13:07

Izzy MTT are not "men in dresses" for goodness sake. Stop being hysterical!

That's not what she was saying though. And she wasn't being hysterical!

KondosSecretJunkRoom · 02/09/2016 13:13

Ah, hysteria, the curse of the wandering womb.

Female biology has been levied against the female sex for an eternity and all the while apparently we've been spunking our cis privilege up the wall.

ErrolTheDragon · 02/09/2016 13:16

Yes...

hysteria
once termed to be a disorder of only women (thus the root words being hyster, as it was originally thought that the uterus was a free floating object in a woman's body, and when lost would cause her to be hysterical), the original cure was for the doctor to masturbate the woman.
mostly it is characterized by uncontrollable emotion, be it amusement, fear, etc, in a given situation.

Once you know the history of the term, you can see why it's not a great one to throw at a feminist while simultaneously being trans-exclusionary. A real corker.

OscarDeLaYenta · 02/09/2016 13:18

Maybe we need to just try it out and see what earns a deletion, a suspension or a ban.

I have deliberately 'misgendered' a selection of MTT, who insist on the pronoun 'she' on I am Still Spartacus. No comment from MNHQ. Perhaps this is what is needed to get MNHQ to respond.

ErrolTheDragon · 02/09/2016 13:19

And also leads one not to remember not to be entirely trusting of the medical profession. I wonder how on earth they came up with that remarkable 'therapy'? Puts the odd TUBE into perspective...

anyway, we digress...

BeyondASpecialSnowflake · 02/09/2016 13:27

Urgh, a tad OT, but I was reading some sex positive thing about vibrators existing for over 100 years, yay masturbation!! Ignoring that they were invented by mh doctors as 'treatment' for hysteria... Angry

makeslogicalsensetome2 · 02/09/2016 13:55

FruitCider Fri 02-Sep-16 12:27:55
MTT are not "men in dresses" for goodness sake. Stop being hysterical!

Experience taught me that some definitely are which is where the umbrella LGBTI is deceiving. These terms are all separate but have been appropriated under the same banner. Equality for all is the favoured outcome I agree.
That means women and children should have a voice. Also read up on how synthetic hormones and blockers affect the system and minds of children, with physical outcomes such as blood clots a reality.
Due to the nature of how MTT surgery is performed it sometimes results in fistulas, the constant need to be vigilant for infections and its not an exact science. Detransitioning can be a nightmare too. Do honest research on the reality rather than the politically correct version.

RE- Sex work. Here is an article from a male perspective. In Defense of Johns.
The author doesn't have a clue. Like a lot of men he has his own illusions on the sex industry. He thinks women really enjoy it. Very few sex workers retire rich. There is a couple of reasons they don't.

time.com/3087616/defense-johns-legalize-prostitution/

microferret · 02/09/2016 14:04

Fruit, we are all interested in equality for everyone. And in an equal society, no minority group should get to try to redefine reality in a way that is severely detrimental to 50% of the population. No group should be able to demand that the whole of society engages in a mass delusion in order to validate their collective identity. Many trans women do not demand this, but a very vocal and influential minority do.

I want trans people to be able to live lives free of violence, hate and discrimination. I believe it is possible to achieve this without rejecting biological fact and years of scientific consensus, and without trampling all over women's rights to female-only spaces, spaces that we still desperately need. I don't see why this is hateful or phobic. Please enlighten me.

makeslogicalsensetome2 · 02/09/2016 14:08

Our children are guinea pigs.They admit their baseline is too general and they cannot give 100 % reliable outcomes for children who are given synthetic hormones and blockers. They also admit cross sex hormones change the way the brain works so the 70-80% of kids who normally outgrow their transgender feelings may not do so after using hormones.

Its better to allow children the freedom to express themselves with no societal repercussions that to medically intervene until more studies have been done.

PacificDogwod · 02/09/2016 14:11

I want trans people to be able to live lives free of violence, hate and discrimination. I believe it is possible to achieve this without rejecting biological fact and years of scientific consensus, and without trampling all over women's rights to female-only spaces, spaces that we still desperately need. I don't see why this is hateful or phobic.

Me too.

BeyondASpecialSnowflake · 02/09/2016 14:13

I don't think there is a single person here who wants transpeople to come to harm!! It's just a nonsense straw man woman that anyone here is actually transphobic.

microferret · 02/09/2016 14:17

KondosSecretJunkRoom your post made me laugh! Yeah cis privilege for women is just great isn't it. I love exercising the privilege of being talked over, belittled and interrupted, or sexually harassed at work, in bars, in clubs, on public transport, on the street, online and even whilst 8 months pregnant. I'm actually 9 weeks pregnant again and let me tell you just how much I enjoyed vomiting my cis privilege into the toilet first thing this morning! pure exhilaration. No doubt I'll be smugly exercising my cis privilege as my baby bursts out of my vagina, then I can just bask in the glow of pure privilege as the doctor stitches me up.

It's probably terribly insensitive of me to talk about this though - Julia Serano might be reading!

PacificDogwod · 02/09/2016 14:22

Can transpeople be 'cisphobic'??

That's a facile and facetious question, but honestly?! 'Cis privilege'

TwatbadgingCuntfuckery · 02/09/2016 14:22

The child and adolescent brain should not be tested on with hormone therapies and puberty blockers. It should be standard practice that under the age of 21 at the very least - because this is usually the point teens/young adults stop growing, have reached their mature bodies and the changes with puberty are pretty much done - Is not given any sort of puberty blocker or transition treatment. Until the facts of such treatment are fully understood and young adults can make an informed decision and they are more aware about their desires for children etc. even then it might be the case it's not advised at all or even banned. because this is what happens with new treatments if the risk outweighs the benefits. It's banned or used in only extreme cases.

microferret · 02/09/2016 14:31

Snowflake of course you are 100% correct. I want Fruit to tell us why she thinks that we are wrong.

Kropotkinator · 02/09/2016 14:46

That's a facile and facetious question, but honestly?! 'Cis privilege'

Because now Starto experience misogyny without trying to is a privilegeStar.

Atenco · 02/09/2016 14:52

I don't live in the UK and have no personal experience of these problems, but what must upsets me is the idea of children being encouraged to take these life-altering steps, especially as, AFAIK, nobody had this problem until the medical treatment for it was invented.

venusinscorpio · 02/09/2016 15:01

Yes. For example mainstream trans media pundit Paris Lees, loved by C4 and the BBC, tells us all about how lucky we are to experience street harassment.

Here is a quote from this fantastic article:

"I wasn't brought up in this way (my bold) and I don't feel frightened when some spunky dude comes and talks to me."

Well now Paris, you don't say.

www.vice.com/en_uk/read/enjoying-catcalls-paris-lees-column

venusinscorpio · 02/09/2016 15:02

That was to Krop's post re "cis privilege"

venusinscorpio · 02/09/2016 15:04

Any thoughts Fruit?

microferret · 02/09/2016 15:06

Wow, found this gem

www.theestablishment.co/2016/04/21/anti-trans-feminists-are-more-dangerous-than-religious-zealots/

The author goes on about how "white cis feminists" are totally responsible for the murders of trans women of colour, even though the people who murder trans women of colour tend to be johns, who are probably the people in society least likely to be influenced by what radical feminists think. The writer talks about being trans and how awful these white cis feminists are, how instrumental in their oppression, but when you scroll down to see their photograph this person presents unambiguously as male. It's just breathtaking.

PolterGoose · 02/09/2016 15:09

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

OlennasWimple · 02/09/2016 15:12

"cisphobia" = "misogyny" - again, no need to invent a new word when there's an existing one Smile

What of the intersectionality that sees transwomen in many countries statistically more likely to be working in the sex industry than women? And that sex worker transwomen are statistically more likely to be murdered (as with women sex workers) than non-sex worker transwomen?

OP posts:
WankingMonkey · 02/09/2016 15:16

Izzy MTT are not "men in dresses" for goodness sake. Stop being hysterical!

But men in dresses are included in the whole trans-umbrella and these men in dresses are exactly what people are protesting to? You cannot simply say 'I am a woman in my pink brain' and that is that. And honestly I don't understand why more transsexual people (genuine ones, not blokes on a power trip) do not stand up and say 'look, this isn't trans' and distance themselves from it all.

microferret · 02/09/2016 15:17

Well obviously the trans lobby likes to ignore that fact, because it's easier to blame and bully feminists than it is to solve the problem of male violence.