Note - written before THAT deletion message (great though it is it is only one and would like to see more reassurance that this is going to be mnhq's stance henceforth).
So...
' cos the poster is clever enough to not actually break the guide lines.' I've suggested before the guidelines be reviewed - been flamed - and MNHQ done nothing.
I've had seemingly positive PRIVATE responses to reports BUT the posts are still there!
' If you wouldn't say it to someone's face' that's SUPPOSED to be one if the guidelines but I VERY RARELY see it implemented.
So is writing disablist shit - which is also ILLEGAL (wonder what equalities legislators would think of MNHQ allowing these posts to remain?). PLUS as several posters have said, would MNHQ be leaving these posts to stand if they were racist?
Yes to #justpeople
'Those that decry "the special needs brigade" are the very reason MNHQ need to step up and say "WE'RE the SN brigade and WE say stop with the disablist shit".'
Come on MNHQ!
'Why restrict posts about people's attitude to the forums where people understand it. We need to challenge the attitudes of those who don't!' THIS EXACTLY!
' It's been a very busy day today ' I'm SO SICK of seeing this as apparently it is mnhq's standard response when 'apologising' for letting things slip. If there's an excuse it's NOT a real apology (as I teach my dd!). If it's so busy so frequently HIRE MORE STAFF! I don't believe you couldn't afford to!! Plus would you have a think and an office discussion if mn were being flooded by racist posts?! I think not!
'one thing i wish mn hq would do. is when they delete a post for being disablist, they give that reason' yes, I hate the very vague 'for breaching talk guidelines'
' I also wonder if the three strikes thing just applies to one thread when it should be posters total history.' And for all types of breach. If goady on one thread, disablist on another and personal attack on another...ban!
Great article by sandy but...how is it directly relevant to this thread? No mention of experiences of prejudice from the general public
Posters saying they won't fold their buggy etc ARE disablist they are admitting they would act in a way so as to EXCLUDE the disabled which is illegal. 'What else call it, other than disablist?' Exactly
While it's possible to argue moderating would be hard, currently I really feel MNHQ are going too far the other way and where there's ANY doubt leaving posts up, not even hiding temporarily very often. I also don't like it's only one mod deciding. If there's a lot of report of a post at least 2 mods should review.
'. I don't say it lightly - I have been around MN about a decade and this is the worst I have ever seen it' 14 years for me and I agree, subtle moderation is one thing lax is quite another.
'If MNHQ want to be seen to taking a zero tolerance approval to disablism, which I assume they do, that doesn't mean just deleting whole bunfighty threads it means getting rid of disablist posters.' YES!