Erm please don't ban me but....

[FlossyMoo]

Why have you stopped the thread I was on. I won't mention it's name or link it as I don't want to be deleted for TAAT. You site "not what MN is about" as the reason for suspending the thread. Does that mean you are going to ban the women hating, incest promoting, Robin Thicke (Blurred lines) agreeing, all women lie, mothers kill their children more than men, I DON'T pay a penny for my kids poster then?

Seriously though don't ban me please

Reasonable question

Hey, anyone called "flossy" could never get banned from anywhere

Normally I would assume there is good reason but the first reply is from Anyfucker which means there's a glitch in the matrix somewhere...

I gave some of my best lines on that thread

Seems like a reasonable question to me.

aw, I hope they don't ban him, he was such fun. In a terrifying creepy way.

I wondered this. That thread was a fascinating insight into the mind of an MRA, as well as having some good statistics and links. Shame it's been suspended.

AF said I could keep him as a pet. I have a rock to put him under and everything

PBH, it must be late because I can't work out what you mean in your post

Missed it.

Bugger.

Ooh, was it the 1-2% one? Asking for "a friend?"

I backed out of that real quick.

no

it's still there, Latte

Well I'm still here so either they have decided not to ban me or they haven't seen this thread

It's the one about Loose Women in AIBU. It's about half way down the page now.

suspended not deleted

I honestly don't get it. Here we have a person calling feminists men haters, saying murders from DV are part of the feminist sorry feminazi movement, openly admits to not financially supporting his children for 4 years just to get one over on his ex and AND he thinks a man who promotes incest and no means yes from a women is a swell guy and the thread is deleted because HE didn't find it supportive

Yes and the only post of his MNHQ picked up on, was to explain why the site is called Mumsnet and to reassure him of their commitment to gender equality.

Exactly Bas

Lets ignore the fact he said that the murder of 2 women (See AF I listened ) per week from DV is a lie made up just to benefit the Feminazi. Lets ignore.....I can't be arsed to list the things he said because there were so many but you get the gist.

Just RTFT & tbf, he had a point: violence is wrong, regardless of gender. He got one thing right! I'm a little confused about how it went from a discussion about one person's opinion of a debate about DV to another person arguing that he was doing the right thing by refusing to pay maintenance or, presumably, see his children at all given that he referred to supervised contact as a breach of his human rights. There was me thinking it's about the children's rights...

I'm intrigued to know why it was suspended rather than just deleted altogether. It's not like any parents with similar outlooks are going to come along, do a search, read the thread & suddenly change their opinions. They'll come, start a new thread & have their own argument about it. Why leave it up?

Don't get me wrong we agreed violence was indeed wrong. It was the more women are violent then men cos the prison system proves it crap we found a bit

I didn't understand the thread suspension message either. Would you mind explaining please HQ?

I have no idea about the thread in question but this one looks important and I hope you don't get banned.

So do I

I was a little about that too, Bas, but it was too late to comment onthread by the time I noticed...