I am aware that you can't divulge the means by which you determine whether or not a poster is genuine, predominantly because if you make that common knowledge then posters will know how to avoid being detected in the future.
but jess (long ongoing eleven weeks abortion threads) threads have now been deleted for being a troll, and I was wondering if, given it's the site users who usually report these things, we could perhaps have a bit more by way of explanation?
e.g. when sassysusan was banned, mn hq confirmed that she had previously posted as washwithcare, and users were able to identify.
There has been some speculation that jess was dizzymare, and I wondered whether this was the case?
Also, these threads have been ongoing for over a month now. How is it that it takes quite this long to determine that someone isn't actually all they seem?
MNHQ have commented on this thread
Site stuff
mn hq, can we have an explanation - jess - and maybe re other trolls in future?
wannaBe · 20/02/2012 13:40
Surely just the thread titles were enough to make people 
I know some people have sympathy for the type of sad act who trolls like this, but really they are just utterly worthless people.
But why do they do it? Do they just get off on the attention, or is it more sinister than that?
I was lurking on that thread, and thought it didn't ring true, but how do you know? You can't just say to mnhq 'this is a bit dodge' can you? Life can be strange, just because my life is quite dull predictable sedate, doesn't mean that others with more exciting lives are trolls.
I've spent all weekend on mn (house of cold and sick at the moment), and there are a few threads at the moment that make me go . Should I be reporting all of them?
"Surely just the thread titles were enough to make people
" obviously not. Even on the last thread there were people saying things like "you should all be ashamed of yourselves, here is a vulnerable young woman needing our support..." etc etc, when I would have thought that to anyone it was bloody obvious that it was a load of rubbish.
I always report suspicions. MNHQ won't know unless we tell them - whether it's a troll or a person in desperate need of RL support. Depending on time of day I generally just send 
or 
to ease the shift along. The mods know far better than me what to do with the information!
I always get a lovely email from MNTowers to say thanks.
Jess was a troll? I read those threads but didnt post, had a small suspicion and then thought I was being too cynical. Wonder how MNHQ found out?
To the posters who said she was posting all over the internet witht he same story how disd you find that out, was she daft enough to use the same username? 
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
I reported Jess, I was in at the beginning, and offered to meet. Thankfully in an open public place. Nothing came of it though. I gave up somewhere around the middle of the first thread though it was frustrating and sick and i was pretty sure she was not genuine. I'm quite impressed, my trolldar is improving! Im a little annoyed at how long it took though, bearing in mind, as I said on the deleted thread, she was starting multiple threads about as highly emotive and upsetting subject as late abortion on the pregnancy boards and many many people were sucked in. 
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.