Preference for different circumcisions

[MandiBarker]

Hey folks;

Was recently thinking about how there are different kinds of circumcisions by the looks of things.

Some men seem to have more loose skin than others; like some seem to have a bit of skin that bunches up behind the head whilst others are tight and smooth. Some men have less of that pinky sensitive skin behind the head than others. And for some men they have scars that look like battle wounds whilst others have nice, neat, straight scars.

I was curious if these differences make any impact to sex life? Which kinda version do people tend to prefer and why?

(Sorry for the off-beat topic!)

From a woman's point of view, I have been with quite a few men and yet only one was circumcised. I don't remember anything about it to be honest, other than he didn't have a foreskin. It didn't affect his performance.

I'm in the UK, and I have never had sex with a man with a circumcised penis.

I can imagine if I ever did, that I would be pretty unbothered, however, I recently figured out that one of the reasons I find porn so deeply unarousing is the giant, circumcised penises in it.

I learnt this by almost enjoying some amateur(ish) couples porn with a man with a believably-sized, uncircumcised penis, and it felt like coming home. I think the circumcision scars freak me out a little and add to the robotic fakeness of the way male porn stars look.

But honestly, in real life, I can't imagine giving a stuff and actually find the idea a little objectifying. I wouldn't put up with a man having a preference for labia that look a certain way, for example.

Was recently thinking about how there are different kinds of circumcisions by the looks of things.

there are different methods for performing a circumcision, but ultimately the outcome should be the same …

I prefer an unmutilated penis, unless of course it is for medical reasons.

If circumcised as an adult, some doctors ask regarding preferences. My OH was circumcised. Went to a specialist clinic and during the consultation the Dr explained different "styles" which meant he could retain some foreskin or have a "tight" one which meant all excess removed, which is what he chose.

So as someone that experienced both on the same man, I really like him circumcised. We do sometimes use lube when I'm rubbing him at the start which he really loves. I think he is slightly less sensitive which is a really good thing as he lasts much longer. For us it was really positive

It's actually a shame that it is still OK to endorse a largely unnecessary operation removing the skin with lovely sensitive nerve endings that provide exhilarating sensual feelings during sex from young males without their choice.

As a bloke, this thread is making me wince. Fab for those who have It done/want It, but not for me...

I've only ever been with one man who was intact, the rest circumcised.

As for different types of circumcision- all I can think is that the newborn penis is so tiny, it'd wouldn't be hard to take off too much, or less than that etc.

When I had my son now 6, circumcision wasn't an option, it's not done in public hospitals here and it wouldn't have occurred to me to put him through it anyway.

I've slept with two people are are circumcised. One has a fair amount of loose skin, I guess, because I don't notice much difference. The other is much tighter and my usual techniques didn't work for him at first... turns out I only feel comfortable handling him with some kind of lubrication.