itsbetterthanabox
Okay, I'll go there. Forget surgically altered porn stars - in my own experience, I've seen different types of vulvas.
Some have been very neat, tidy tucked away slots with only a tiny bit of inner labia showing. My own personal taste and preference is for this type. I find this the most attractive. That is allowed.
Some have had a fair bit of inner labia showing and protruding downwards - again no problem, it is what it is and whilst not so visually appealing to me personally, happy to get on with it.
Some have massive dangling lips that are crinkled, bunched up like a pile of gym rope and need to be rummaged through and carefully separated to get inside. I personally find this really unattractive and off putting and would actually turns me off and would certainly not want to go down there. This is also allowed.
Now, I know we're all different and we all like and dislike different things, so I'm just as entitled to have my preference the same way some women like tattoos, others like blonde men, others like tanned skin - it's all preference.
With genitals, it's not something you see whilst speed dating and will often only find out the landscape well into a relationship where you are happy and in love with everything else. You discover that the undercarriage is really off putting to you and you really don't like it, so make a decision and think, "Oh well, nobody's perfect, neither am I, I'll just not go down there"
Within those preferences, there are limits of what we find acceptable. I've read on here some women stating that their husbands have put on a load of weight, have big beer bellies and poor hygiene and simply cannot get turned on or in some cases are repulsed by their appearance. What I'm talking about is the same - a point where the appearance of something is outside of our window of 'get on with it'.
So - to my original question, what does a man say to his partner when she asks why he won't go down on her without hurting her feelings, knowing there's nothing she can do about it?