Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Why white children are not getting into grammar schools

303 replies

deanstreet · 13/02/2026 15:23

www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/02/11/why-white-children-are-not-getting-into-grammar-schools/?WT.mc_id=tmgoff_fb_photo_not-getting-into-grammar-schools

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
GrillaMilla · 13/02/2026 16:15

Dorisbonson · 13/02/2026 16:10

They don't stop anyone else getting a decent education do they?

My view is if grammars didn't exist, and everyone went to the local comp, they would have more pressure to improve. Because they'd have to.

CactusSwoonedEnding · 13/02/2026 16:17

Non-paywall link https://archive.is/4N79F - it's not difficult to have the basic respect to get the free version @deanstreet

glitterpaperchain · 13/02/2026 16:18

deanstreet · 13/02/2026 16:01

@ghostyslovesheets

It is a problem because the non-whites are beating the whites in their own game.

'In their own game'? What do you mean by that?

treeowl · 13/02/2026 16:19

It’s nothing to do with valuing education they want the same outcomes and will top up with tutoring rather than pit their kids in such a single focus environment

Agree

stargirl27 · 13/02/2026 16:19

deanstreet · 13/02/2026 16:01

@ghostyslovesheets

It is a problem because the non-whites are beating the whites in their own game.

What game?

Donttellempike · 13/02/2026 16:19

dizzydizzydizzy · 13/02/2026 15:39

PS. DC1 (white British) failed the 11+, went to a comprehensive and came out of there with 4 x Astar at A-Level and a place on a masters course at a top uni and then graduated with a 1st.

The 11+ does not always work as a selection method!

It selects the top performers on the day. That’s it.

Your point is irrelevant

MrsFaustus · 13/02/2026 16:21

I agree re comps. My two nephews did extremely well in an area with no grammar schools, you had a choice of private or comp. I suspect the number of bright children with invested parents drove up results and ambition. One of my local comps (an area where no official grammars but selective group of schools creamed off the brightest and/or most tutored) had a huge number of pupils with special needs and/or fsm. How can these schools thrive ? (I’m thinking of you, Hertfordshire).

deanstreet · 13/02/2026 16:21

The government will use Children Services and "emotional harm" to slow them down

OP posts:
treeowl · 13/02/2026 16:22

The growing influx of Hong Kongers in SW London are very focused on grammars

Donttellempike · 13/02/2026 16:23

Screamingabdabz · 13/02/2026 15:47

Not in our leafy green county. Firmly white middle class parents who are privileged enough pay the overinflated house prices and the hothouse tutor to make absolutely certain that Oscar and Ottilie don’t have to brush up against the great unwashed and riff raff.

It’s so far removed now from the ideal of the 1950s system that really enriched the lives of poor with potential.

Ask yourself why it’s ’so competitive’ - it’s just a two tier state education now. Many pupils in ordinary secondary schools are losing their minds or refusing to go because it’s horrendous and a daily battle with disruptive behaviour and large classes because of underfunding and teacher shortages/disaffection. Meanwhile the more affluent and the pushy get their kids in to grammars and are actually getting an education. So they get the pick of the unis, the jobs and the system of privilege self perpetrates.

The best schools are stuffed with pushy parents.

People who value education and whose kids tend to do so too , as well as respecting the teachers . That is WHY they are the best performing schools 🤷‍♀️

dizzydizzydizzy · 13/02/2026 16:26

HappyFace2025 · 13/02/2026 16:12

Not London generally, only 19 e.g
Kingston, Sutton, Wallington, otherwise it's Kent, Essex, Buckinghamshire and Berkshire (all Home Counties) and the reason why many families move out of London when their children are young.

Yes, London mainly has comprehensive. For some reason there are 19 grammars - they all seem to be in outer boroughs.

HappyFace2025 · 13/02/2026 16:27

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

ThatGreatCritic · 13/02/2026 16:28

Dorisbonson · 13/02/2026 16:14

As white people are becoming a minority in several parts of the UK expect more focus on "white" issues in the same way their has been for black and Asians.

At school age white British children are a minority in multiple major cities now eg London Birmingham Manchester etc

I think some of that might be because the white working class people who are locals do not necessarily have white children. Especially in those urban areas. Doesn't mean those children arent part of a white British family by any means.

Simonjt · 13/02/2026 16:31

A quick google shows the grammar I attended has 69.5% of their pupils as white British, where as the comp I attended in the same area has 74% white British and the local girls grammar has 81% white British. A quick google also says around 90% of residents of the town are white British. So there is minimal difference between the two schools.

APatternGrammar · 13/02/2026 16:32

I went to a grammar school myself and don’t think they should exist any longer; a system that serves all should be preferred.
But as they still do, and as they take the strongest performers on the day of the test, it’s ridiculous to dispute the outcome of that if you agree with the system as a whole.
There’s a huge culture of anti-intellectualism and anti-expertise among certain groups in the UK and we are seeing the fruits of this now.

treeowl · 13/02/2026 16:33

dizzydizzydizzy · 13/02/2026 16:26

Yes, London mainly has comprehensive. For some reason there are 19 grammars - they all seem to be in outer boroughs.

And they are incredibly competitive

TorroFerney · 13/02/2026 16:34

pencilcaseandcabbage · 13/02/2026 15:42

I'm in a grammar school area. My (white) kids all got in. The school was ethnically diverse with a good mix from many backgrounds, but nothing like the article mentions. I do recognise that some of my kids friends had much more strict parents than me, e.g. all clubs/activities stopped in the months before any exams whereas mine carried on if they wanted to, even during A levels. I suppose that made me lax!

My response to the article is 'fair enough'. It's hardly surprising that kids with parents who support their education do better.

Edited

Same here. I think 12 from my daughter’s junior school (little village school) got in the year she started. Ten white out of the 12.

is op inferring some nefarious practices going on, favouring non white kids? Or is the article suggesting that ? I’d say the opposite for my child’s school as the catchment area is very white and out of catchment you need a higher mark in the exam. Majority of non white kids are out of catchment.

Jk987 · 13/02/2026 16:35

As far as I know, Grammar schools are not void of the presence of white children!

Tarkadaaaahling · 13/02/2026 16:37

In some communities attending a grammar school is so highly prized the amount of work the kids are made to do borders on abuse.

Anecdotal, but a family friend insisted on her child doing several hours of work every day in the months before taking the grammar school exam (having already been doing extra work at home for years with this aim) and even removed them from school for a whole week before the test just to cram and cram and cram.

Perhaps for some families it's worth it. Personally I don't think it is. It's a personal choice

dizzydizzydizzy · 13/02/2026 16:37

Donttellempike · 13/02/2026 16:19

It selects the top performers on the day. That’s it.

Your point is irrelevant

I know it’s not strictly on topic but it’s not irrelevant. It shows you that an incredibly bright person who would have been at the top end of a grammar couldn’t pass the test, despite attending teacher-led preparation classes at school. DC1 actually took two 11+ exams for two different local authorities so it wasn’t a case of having an off day.

To me it is an example of what a poor selection tool the 11+ is. Presumably this is one of the reasons why most of the country abandoned it.

I went to a grammar myself. We all passed the 11+. There were several in my class who should not have done. My best friend from primary did not pass and is one of the most intelligent people I have ever met. (I’m still in regular contact with her).

treeowl · 13/02/2026 16:37

I think people are forgetting there are grammars & then there are grammars. The top ones in the entire country will have fewer white pupils.

Friendlygingercat · 13/02/2026 16:37

I was a white working class kid who failed the 11+ back in the 1950s. My parents would never have afforded the uniform and bus fare so it was probably to the good.
I went to uni as a mature student, rose through the educational system and gained a PhD. I was an acedemic for 10 years but am now retired from employed work.I do some private online tutoring at post grad level. I prefer international/ethnic minority students because they are incredibly had working and respectful. They come from a culture where authority figures are respected. Some (white) students have an unfortunate "I pay your wages I want some service" attitude.

Anyahyacinth · 13/02/2026 16:40

I went to a Grammar School ..it was a pretty mediocre experience where the results were linked to the students abilities and not the teaching.

As these are selective schools who cares who they select

Donttellempike · 13/02/2026 16:41

dizzydizzydizzy · 13/02/2026 16:37

I know it’s not strictly on topic but it’s not irrelevant. It shows you that an incredibly bright person who would have been at the top end of a grammar couldn’t pass the test, despite attending teacher-led preparation classes at school. DC1 actually took two 11+ exams for two different local authorities so it wasn’t a case of having an off day.

To me it is an example of what a poor selection tool the 11+ is. Presumably this is one of the reasons why most of the country abandoned it.

I went to a grammar myself. We all passed the 11+. There were several in my class who should not have done. My best friend from primary did not pass and is one of the most intelligent people I have ever met. (I’m still in regular contact with her).

It just shows that the grammar is very selective.

As a comparison, lots of Oxbridge applicants get turned down every year. Only the brightest apply in the first place. So plenty of of very clever people are rejected every year.

it’s the nature of a selective system. It’s rationing .

Plenty who don’t get in would have thrived if they had.

Swipe left for the next trending thread