Hi @Mabs49 so it’s fair to say that time spent in a country will always improve your language skills, especially speaking. This is enhanced if you spend longer there (weeks or months rather than days) and your days are filled with interactions in the native language (you study at uni there, you work there, you socialise with native speakers). So a year abroad as a language assistant is a lot better than a weekend in Paris seeing the sights. In terms of courses, I don’t know about any specifically so I can’t advise if they are worth it. The Cactus courses you mention permanently ceased trading in July this year, according to its LinkedIn profile, but I guess there are others. I presume they involve staying in the country and going to classes where the target language is spoken and taught – all broadly good but it’s dependent how much they cost and whether you can afford that as to whether they are useful enough to justify the cost.
Also time with a tutor who knows the exam specs might be of more immediate benefit.
In terms of specifics sought in GCSE and A level exams, I actually think it is a good thing that the GCSE spec is specific about what it is looking for in answers – it helps candidates prepare for the exam. You may agree, but when you say “trot out” phrases it sounds like you don’t maybe?
All GCSE specs actually state what is needed; MFL is not unique there. The kinds of things I am talking about are use of opinions and reasons for them in speaking and writing; and yes, use of a range of tenses (or at least reference to past, present and future) – these seem very reasonable, as does a range of vocab (eg for GCSE you may need to know and use vocab around environmental issues or charity, among several other topics). That’s all good I think. It’s not the case, whatever your DC may have been told, that you won’t gain a grade 9 unless you use [insert specific idiomatic phrase here]. But there are marks for using a range of language and structures and the more confident variation there is, the higher the mark. A grammatically perfect but simply structured piece of writing may score a high mark for accuracy but a lower mark for range of language and communication, for example.
You mention hesitation – yes there is a mark for fluency in the speaking exam but that’s fair enough I think. And for GCSE it’s just 5 marks out of 60 in that exam, so 5 out of 240 in the overall GCSE, so it’s hardly crucial. And to gain 5/5 the spec explicitly states that native speaker standard is not required. So the odd pause or “hmm” is not going to lose anyone a grade 9 (assuming they are otherwise at that standard).
So for A level – all of that and more applies. The examiner is looking (for example) for technical terms when writing about the film (such as phrases relating to camera technique); they are looking for similar analysis when writing about the book (much as GCSE Eng lit does tbh). Students need to learn specific vocab, yes, relating to the topics studied which, as I mentioned earlier, are quite in-depth and political, relating specifically to the country and culture studied – so for French, the importance of the patrimoine and Francophone music (and 10 others); for German the impact of the fall of the Berlin wall and politics among the young people (and 10 others). There will be for sure a lot of new vocab and stats, and a top student will need to have that at their fingertips, especially for the speaking exam.
Sorry for the long long post! I feel a bit defensive here but I do get so fed up of MN posters (NOT anyone here!) commenting that there is no point taking GCSE MFL because basically you are not fluent in German after it - well of course not. What it does do is provide a grounding in the language, much the same way as any other GCSE provides a grounding in that subject. And a GCSE candidate who got a higher grade should be able to converse and understand text on a reasonable range of topics tbh.