Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Read this an tell me you still agree with VAT on school fees

1000 replies

Sally20099 · 28/07/2024 20:19

DS is 3 years from finishing private school which includes 2 years in the sixth form. DD was due to start same senior school in Sept. Both went to private prep but due to talk of VAT on fees, and certainty of Labour govt for some time, we actually investigated sending DD to state secondary school. Only one in the entire city is rated outstanding but DD has got a place so we have decided to send her there. It’s very good academically but obviously hasn’t got the facilities of the private option. Currently school fees are £19,300 per year (before VAT) for DS so we have saved a reasonable sum by going to state school with DD. DS will finish at his school and we could afford DD fees (even with VAT) so we will instead put £12k a year extra in savings for DD and then spend the rest of the savings on an extra winter holiday. We would have never looked at state schools without the VAT policy and instead we have taken the place of someone at an outstanding rated school. Im not posting to annoy anyone, I wanted those who unequivocally support this to see some of the consequences. We also know a reasonable number of children in DS year who can’t afford fees with VAT and are taking their children out of private and going into state - and taking more places at the limited good schools. Its probably no surprise that most families in private schools happen to also live in good areas, meaning catchment areas tend to work out quite well when they go state.

OP posts:
SabrinaThwaite · 28/07/2024 21:40

Bumpitybumper · 28/07/2024 21:33

It's a red herring of a policy that lots people will support it even if it comes at a net cost to the State. The politics of envy is bonkers.

We should be encouraging the rich to pay privately for as much as possible. The last thing we should be doing is incentivising them to use state services that are often over stretched and already struggling for money. Imagine how much money Labour could raise if they could somehow incentivise more parents to pay to educate their children privately! Why does nobody ever suggest this?

The politics of envy is bonkers.

Bingo!

I claim my £5 prize.

newmummycwharf1 · 28/07/2024 21:42

Angrymum22 · 28/07/2024 20:50

How? Why are rich parents going make things better. At a grass roots level they will make the staff and heads lives a misery but as that single ex private parent they are no more likely to change things than the existing several million parents who obviously can’t be arsed to try and change things. Particularly if they have managed to bag a place in an outstanding school. What would they need to change?

In the NHS, there are quite a few patients receiving expensive treatments privately and switch to NHS care when the insurance company stops paying. That has not changed NHS service for the better in any way. Not sure why people think private parents will magically improve state schools (also insulting to state school parents!)

Tiredalwaystired · 28/07/2024 21:42

You’re not taking anyone’s place. Your child has as much right to that place as anyone else. You just chose not to avail yourself of it before. It’s rightfully your child’s place to take.

Zippyy · 28/07/2024 21:42

Read it and yes I do.

Honestly I despair I really do. Do you really expect people to read your anecdote and say oh silly me! I never thought of that! Yes I'm going to completely change my mind now!

And more fool you sending DS private when there's a good state school.

I hope the riff raff aren't too appalling.

Ourdearoldqueen · 28/07/2024 21:44

RhubarbandCustardYummyYummy · 28/07/2024 20:32

I still agree with the VAT on private schools. Over a million kids in the uk are living in poverty. Get a grip. HTH

This^^

Summerhillsquare · 28/07/2024 21:44

RhubarbandCustardYummyYummy · 28/07/2024 20:32

I still agree with the VAT on private schools. Over a million kids in the uk are living in poverty. Get a grip. HTH

This all-day long.

Serious question, why do rich people keep posting threads trying to persuade the rest of us that we should pay for their privileges? Is it not enough to be privileged, you have to have everyone's approval as well?

newmummycwharf1 · 28/07/2024 21:44

Sherrystrull · 28/07/2024 21:19

Not all children from private schools will end up at the best state secondaries by the way. Many won't get a place just like other children.

Most will move at normal entry points and will likely be in a better position to secure houses in catchment.

peachesarenom · 28/07/2024 21:46

😂

Tiredalwaystired · 28/07/2024 21:47

helpingDDfindaccomadation · 28/07/2024 20:58

If in the future your DD's earning potential is not the same as her brothers, the resentment will set in

This may come as a surprise but state school children can still do incredibly well and have just as good earnings potential as they would have done if they had got similar grades in a private school.

CoffeeNeededorWine · 28/07/2024 21:48

Sally20099 · 28/07/2024 21:15

thanks for the message - I’m not looking for sympathy I promise. I’m pointing out that this tax wont impact us at all - we have our daughter at an outstanding school and will save c£20k a year. The sad outcome is that another child (possibly less privileged) has now lost their place at an outstanding rated school and this will be replicated many times up and down the country. How is that sensible as a policy?

It has impacted you though. One child has a private education and one does not. Regardless, of the money in savings. One child will have a private education on their job application one will not. That is a MASSIVE impact.

newmummycwharf1 · 28/07/2024 21:48

BigCroc · 28/07/2024 21:29

In the news today, according to HMRC, even the best case scenario for the VAT changes will not raise the money that Labour are supposedly spending on recruiting new teachers. There’s a significant shortfall.
They modelled 3 scenarios. None will provide the money Labour are allocating to the state sector. This means the state sector will not receive the resources they desperately need.
This policy is not correctly costed, and was reliant on people not changing their behaviour.
People always change their behaviour. State schools deserve proper funding. This is not enough.

I don't think those that support the policy do so for the revenue it will raise. Most seem for VAT ideologically. I believe they have other strategies for improving state school funding cos we all know this ain't it

Rfthyhuj · 28/07/2024 21:48

Sally20099 · 28/07/2024 20:53

DD is going to get a fund worth over £100k at university as we will save £12-£14k a year for her until she leaves sixth form. (Ie most of the savings each year from state vs private).

You’re going to have an absolutely furious son on your hands.

Newposter180 · 28/07/2024 21:48

I would be considered a high earner but went to state school and my children will too. However, I struggle to understand why so many people are happy to tax private education and not university or other forms of education (which are also arguably a luxury)?

I’m also slightly confused by some of the arguments above to the effect that if not everyone can afford something, it shouldn’t be available. That’s just life; I quite fancy owning a yacht but I can’t because I don’t have enough money.

Either way, OP’s post doesn’t help her cause at all!

Ourdearoldqueen · 28/07/2024 21:49

Private education IS a luxury item. If you can’t afford the 20% then you couldn’t afford it to begin with.

Get your head from up your backside.

Thindog · 28/07/2024 21:49

Send your children to state schools and use your excessive wealth to support that school, and benefit children not so privileged.

Imaginaryhairstyle · 28/07/2024 21:49

Bumpitybumper · 28/07/2024 21:33

It's a red herring of a policy that lots people will support it even if it comes at a net cost to the State. The politics of envy is bonkers.

We should be encouraging the rich to pay privately for as much as possible. The last thing we should be doing is incentivising them to use state services that are often over stretched and already struggling for money. Imagine how much money Labour could raise if they could somehow incentivise more parents to pay to educate their children privately! Why does nobody ever suggest this?

No - a strong state sector is formed from everyone having a stake in it. For as long as wealthy people like the op think that state schools are for the ‘less privileged’ (a misconception!) then wealthy people like her will also carry that discrimination into other areas of life - perhaps assuming that the state educated candidate she interviews for a job is not as well rounded as the privately educated one, or simply that state educated people are not ‘like us’.

what if everyone was ‘like us’? What if we had a society where everyone cared about decent education for everyone, not just for their own kids? Maybe some
things would start to get organised differently.

that is where the left wing is coming from. Not envy. Ambition. For all of us.

I want op’s daughter to have a good education. I am not envious of her wealth. It’s weird to me that people assume envy is the motivator. Is that what motivates people to send their kids to private school perhaps? So that is the culture you’re immersed in - the desire to be better than others?

Ourdearoldqueen · 28/07/2024 21:49

It’s like arguing about whether there should be tax breaks on Yachts.

No. No.

Putyourfeckingsockson · 28/07/2024 21:50

Sorry, just to clarify… you’re asking people to sympathise with you because, although you could still afford private school fees despite the VAT, you have decided to send her to state school and have an EXTRA winter holiday? Can I also ask why you think private schools should have a tax loophole when clearly they are for the benefit of a privileged minority whilst thousands of children remain in poverty across the country? Perhaps donate some of your savings on DD’s school fees to a food bank. 🙄

Ourdearoldqueen · 28/07/2024 21:50

Imaginaryhairstyle · 28/07/2024 21:49

No - a strong state sector is formed from everyone having a stake in it. For as long as wealthy people like the op think that state schools are for the ‘less privileged’ (a misconception!) then wealthy people like her will also carry that discrimination into other areas of life - perhaps assuming that the state educated candidate she interviews for a job is not as well rounded as the privately educated one, or simply that state educated people are not ‘like us’.

what if everyone was ‘like us’? What if we had a society where everyone cared about decent education for everyone, not just for their own kids? Maybe some
things would start to get organised differently.

that is where the left wing is coming from. Not envy. Ambition. For all of us.

I want op’s daughter to have a good education. I am not envious of her wealth. It’s weird to me that people assume envy is the motivator. Is that what motivates people to send their kids to private school perhaps? So that is the culture you’re immersed in - the desire to be better than others?

Perfectly done. 👍🏻

SabrinaThwaite · 28/07/2024 21:50

Farting · 28/07/2024 21:35

Correct and they all fell for it.

Hard hat on for this but sometimes it’s clear why some people earn a lot of money and others don’t.

Oh gosh, but we keep getting told that private school parents have to live in a tiny house, work multiple jobs, have an ancient car and forego any holidays to be able to afford private schools?

BTW, you can earn well AND send your kids to state school. It’s not mutually exclusive.

Zippyy · 28/07/2024 21:50

@Imaginaryhairstyle how very well said!

CoffeeNeededorWine · 28/07/2024 21:51

Tiredalwaystired · 28/07/2024 21:47

This may come as a surprise but state school children can still do incredibly well and have just as good earnings potential as they would have done if they had got similar grades in a private school.

Yes, they can but there is a chance that resentment will set in, if it they don’t.

There was a post on MN not so long ago. The OP was seriously annoyed that her sisters had private education and she never. She blamed all her shortcomings in life on this. There was clearly ALOT of resentment.

Sherrystrull · 28/07/2024 21:51

Zippyy · 28/07/2024 21:50

@Imaginaryhairstyle how very well said!

I agree too!

Sallyh87 · 28/07/2024 21:51

I’m not sure of all the technical logic for, or against, VAT on school or indeed what side I fall down on. However if you currently have that much disposable income, which is way more than most of us can dream of, don’t expect sympathy.

Rfthyhuj · 28/07/2024 21:52

Sally20099 · 28/07/2024 21:15

thanks for the message - I’m not looking for sympathy I promise. I’m pointing out that this tax wont impact us at all - we have our daughter at an outstanding school and will save c£20k a year. The sad outcome is that another child (possibly less privileged) has now lost their place at an outstanding rated school and this will be replicated many times up and down the country. How is that sensible as a policy?

But you could’ve done this for your son too?

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread