Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Secondary education

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

GCSE 2022 Results - the moment of reckoning!

807 replies

Rollergirl11 · 24/08/2022 19:48

Hello everyone, here is a shiny new thread ready for DC’s results day tomorrow and a much needed hand hold for us nervous parents. 🥴🤪

Tomorrow is the culmination of an incredibly turbulent 2 year journey that our young people have had to navigate. Fraught with ups and downs. They have done us all proud!!

Here is a link to the previous thread: www.mumsnet.com/talk/secondary/4566030-current-year-11-2-more-weeks-of-exams?page=37&reply=119483572

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Chakraleaf · 09/09/2022 23:40

NameInUseAlreadyAgain · 09/09/2022 17:34

no grade change here for Eng Lit. Marks stayed the same. He was one mark off a grade 4. Still failed it then. So much for giving the Covid years kids a break. Just thanking everyone it wasn’t Lang he failed.

Same here but emglish lang. In for a November resit now

Womblesaremyfavouritefood · 10/09/2022 08:30

Not heard about our request for re- grading here yet. Might chase the school.

LouisCatorze · 10/09/2022 09:44

I got the decided impression, from when paid for some reviews of marking for DC1 back in 2019, that there was almost an unofficial cut-off in terms of whether they would be successful or not. It seemed that the very early birds (who put in for reviews on Results Day or shortly afterwards), more likely got positive outcomes than those who procrastinated for whatever reason. I seem to recall some wise Mumsnetter suggesting why this might be (something to do with exam boards not wanting sufficient upgrades to skew the normal distribution of results?).

DFOD · 10/09/2022 09:49

LouisCatorze · 10/09/2022 09:44

I got the decided impression, from when paid for some reviews of marking for DC1 back in 2019, that there was almost an unofficial cut-off in terms of whether they would be successful or not. It seemed that the very early birds (who put in for reviews on Results Day or shortly afterwards), more likely got positive outcomes than those who procrastinated for whatever reason. I seem to recall some wise Mumsnetter suggesting why this might be (something to do with exam boards not wanting sufficient upgrades to skew the normal distribution of results?).

That’s interesting - doesn’t seem to fit with the new (prolonged) process of requesting scripts and reviewing with teachers before deciding to pay for a remark?

Also feels disingenuous and unequal for those who may need time to secure extra funds for a remark.

LouisCatorze · 10/09/2022 10:09

@DFOD I could be wrong but it's certainly the impression I was given on MN back then. It could have just been a hunch though. Presumably, some people could choose to just bypass the review of scripts by teachers part of the process which massively slows everything down?

Also feels disingenuous and unequal for those who may need time to secure extra funds for a remark. I think the whole system sucks for those who can't afford (or need to more carefully consider if it's going to be money well-spent) reviews of marking. Another example of 'money (potentially) talking' in education.

MrsHamlet · 10/09/2022 10:34

LouisCatorze · 10/09/2022 09:44

I got the decided impression, from when paid for some reviews of marking for DC1 back in 2019, that there was almost an unofficial cut-off in terms of whether they would be successful or not. It seemed that the very early birds (who put in for reviews on Results Day or shortly afterwards), more likely got positive outcomes than those who procrastinated for whatever reason. I seem to recall some wise Mumsnetter suggesting why this might be (something to do with exam boards not wanting sufficient upgrades to skew the normal distribution of results?).

This is not true.

LouisCatorze · 10/09/2022 10:44

@MrsHamlet well my impression was informed by something written on MN. I certainly didn't arrive at that view myself. So if it's misinformation, glad to hear it.

MrsHamlet · 10/09/2022 10:46

It is definitely misinformation

Lemoncurd · 10/09/2022 10:48

LouisCatorze · 10/09/2022 09:44

I got the decided impression, from when paid for some reviews of marking for DC1 back in 2019, that there was almost an unofficial cut-off in terms of whether they would be successful or not. It seemed that the very early birds (who put in for reviews on Results Day or shortly afterwards), more likely got positive outcomes than those who procrastinated for whatever reason. I seem to recall some wise Mumsnetter suggesting why this might be (something to do with exam boards not wanting sufficient upgrades to skew the normal distribution of results?).

My daughter had English looked at in 2019, we paid right on the deadline (school was encouraging us to do it but we hadn't really looked into it). Her marks went up by 3 when she only needed 1 to get the higher grade.

NameInUseAlreadyAgain · 10/09/2022 17:19

DFOD · 10/09/2022 09:49

That’s interesting - doesn’t seem to fit with the new (prolonged) process of requesting scripts and reviewing with teachers before deciding to pay for a remark?

Also feels disingenuous and unequal for those who may need time to secure extra funds for a remark.

Ours went in day after results day and got result yesterday. So that isn’t true

MrsHamlet · 10/09/2022 18:16

The process of requesting scripts should not be prolonged. It might take the teachers in centre a while to get to them but the boards' parts of it are fairly speedy.

Graff · 12/09/2022 21:09

On another note.. did anyone collecting at the Reading festival use the TGI’s car park in caversham road which was suggested on this and other threads? I got a bloody parking ticket through the post. Turns out although the car park is open post 10pm, you are not actually permitted to enter it 😩😩😩

dee73 · 13/09/2022 07:46

My twins both 5s in AQA English language but 6 and 7 in mocks. They are 1 and 2 marks below border for a 6.
School requested papers and suggest there is potential for a review of paper 2.
Has anyone had any luck with AQA English language remarks.
Not sure whether to bother as both have passed although we're disappointed with result as they got mainly 6s and 7s after working very hard for them.
Thanks

Slowlydoesit · 13/09/2022 11:17

dee73, probably worth a remark if they are only 1/2 marks away from the grade boundary. Good luck.

Forthebestway · 13/09/2022 11:28

My DS had 6 results 1/2 marks from the next boundary . He took 9 GCSES, with a range of results from 8/6 . We are not sure what to do.q

PugInTheHouse · 13/09/2022 12:11

All the marks we know off with DS were 1-3 marks off the next grade boundary. He passed them all 1 5, the rest 6/7s so it's really irrelevant to him IMO unless it will affect getting into college. The 5 was due to a mess up with his practical work on the schools part, the papers he got a mark off an 8 and a mark off a 7 so potentially having those regraded may have bumped it up but it doesn't seem worth the hassle.

Forthebestway · 13/09/2022 12:14

@PugInTheHouse the only thing I'm thinking is that Universities do look at GCSE grades.

PugInTheHouse · 13/09/2022 12:17

Depends I guess, 6-8 is very good. Potentially worth looking at the 6s I guess. Even my best friend who got similar grades still got into a top medical school as she did well as A level, obviously things may well have changed since then.

Rollergirl11 · 13/09/2022 12:43

@Graff oh no! I used that car park but it was 8am on on the Monday morning. There were sooo many parents picking up they will have made a fortune if they’ve issued tickets to everyone. Was it the Sunday night you picked up?

OP posts:
MrsHamlet · 13/09/2022 17:14

Reviews don't look for extra marks. The centre needs someone with experience to look at the papers concerned to see whether there is any scope for movement.

WombatChocolate · 13/09/2022 18:30

Reviews might not look for extra marks, but often when the review of marking is carried out, errors in application of markschemes are identified or the examiner reviewing thinks a question has been out in a wrong level, which means there is a change. Essentially, the impact in some cases will be more marks and possibly a higher grade. Obviously when errors in marking are identified on papers which were close to the next grade boundary, going up a grade is easier to achieve and that’s why it’s still when it’s most applied for.

Yes, in majority of cases the marking is accurate and no change. However, a decent number change.

The other thing to ask for is marks in the 2 or 3 papers to compare. Big anomalous between them if a kid thought it went well can also indicate it’s worth going for.

Sometimes it’s 30 marks down to the grade below and only 1 mark to the one above. the chances or dropping 30 marks are incredibly tiny. A lot of it will come down to if you want to spend £38 or whatever your Board is on a bit of a punt.

MerryMarigold · 14/09/2022 03:31

Our school is charging 65.00 per paper. Is this normal? Are they making a massive profit?!!

MerryMarigold · 14/09/2022 03:33

That's per paper not per subject. We're asking for one paper to be reviewed as he was only 1 mark off a 7 and I think he'd love to have that extra 7 as it was his highest mark.

MrsHamlet · 14/09/2022 07:10

MerryMarigold · 14/09/2022 03:31

Our school is charging 65.00 per paper. Is this normal? Are they making a massive profit?!!

This is not normal! Look on the awarding body websites - they'll tell you what the actual cost is

MerryMarigold · 14/09/2022 07:50

Thanks. Will do