The issues with getting pupils on ppm into grammars has been high lighted endlessly.
There is a gap that children will fall into unless a little bit of out reaching goes on. But that's not allowed in some areas for some bizzare reason. But posters have said before that their state primary has done some extra grammar work and in those areas... Surprise surprise... Those grammars have more pupils on the premium.
And fsm.
It really wouldn't take much for poor disadvantaged students to get what they need to access a grammar.
Parents who have gone through the system could do a few talks.. Give advice and provide some exam techniques... Nvr... Explain the test.. Make sure maths covered and do some speed tests.
I know kids who have been tutored for two years.. Already attending top primary school (state)... Who fail..
A slight nudge for poorer students would give them a massive boost. This is not allowed by politicians and those in eduction who share the views of some posters here..
Because.. They don't want grammars, an they don't want ppm in grammar or fsm. They want the stats to look bad.
They are happy to throw endless kids under the bus in a school that isn't right for them though.. Because they have engaged parents!
Re some comments on sec moderns.. It just needs re branding then. Calling these schools failures or the pupils who attend them failures Is the parents etc and general society.
Mental health issues, self esteem problems and all kinds of failure etc can happen to dc sent to the wrong secondary school.