I agree but he had a trial and was found innocent apart from one case which was unproved and he's admitted that one. I'm not sure what else you think should happen? They trawled to find other complainants and what they came up with was ridiculous and at least one of the complainants were lying.
Do you think he should go spend time in jail for things he hasn't done - is that all that would satisfy people?
I think that trying to get someone put in prison for things they haven't done is abhorrent.
If there is more to it then people should be bringing that forward but the shit show of what scotgov presided over will no doubt discourage others.
He might be sleazy as feck and to be honest i was one of the folk who was ready to believe it. But if he was so inappropriate then where is the evidence and why wasn't he found guilty?
The main person who should have been supported was the case where it wasn't proven and he admitted and apologised. That person continued to work directly with him even though they were offered an alternative - it doesn't really seem like jail type behaviour to me.