I don't think it's that simple.
I'll tell you why I think the way I do.
In life we basically have enough resources to either live quite a frugal life, and save for our/the kid's future, or deprioritise their savings and perhaps their education to an extent, and be able to enjoy luxuries on the way. We chose the latter.
Career wise, we've prioritised being able to attend/support their interests and hobbies over work. This is particularly unusual for mt partner's culture and his peers are generally better off for it, too.
I know people close to me who chose the former. What's interesting is that all of us parents have wavered over the years on whether we chose the right way. Yes my kids have had fun and experiences and trainers(!) that some of my friend's kids haven't had, but then they will have more financial stability in early adulthood. My kids will probably have to work through uni which might limit their options. But at the same time, I do feel that things like our travel and other cultural activities have set them up in other ways. Obviously the ideal would be both and don't get me wrong, the kids have some savings, but we haven't prioritised that side of things.
My point is that couples that made a different choice to us probably waiver too. You wonder if you have made the right choices when you see other people living differently. So I don't think it's as easy as wondering if prestige is your motivator when you're making a tough choice about career vs family. It might be. But with prestige comes money. And money buys things. So it's all just a circle.
We're all doing our best.