have name changed for this. Will try not to drip feed but give you the facts.
I am a high earner. When I met dp (4-5 yrs ago) he was also earning a v good salary but still half of what I earned. We moved in together (he moved into my London flat), he contributed to costs and all was fine. We then decided we were going to buy a house (rurally but nearer his dcs) - my credit is better than his, so last year, we bought a house with a big mortgage in my name.
around a month after this, he lost his job. it was a brutal sacking, they claimed gross misconduct with no evidence so he took them to court and it all got settled out of court but not with a huge payment for him. Due to the fight (months with painstaking evidence) he was incredibly low and he was looking for jobs but really struggling to get them.
as it was near the end of the year (2019) we agreed he would stop looking and give himself a break. In the meantime, because he felt guilty about not contributing cost wise, he really upped all his contributions at home. Started doing all the cooking, shopping etc.
then covid hit and it became clear he wasn't going to find a job so he decided to start a new business, with 2 business partners. It's not profitable yet but it's doing ok (it's a software based business).
my problem, and the reason to ask about the boundaries, is that dp is still unable to contribute anything. I have no idea how long this will continue because I have no idea if or when this business might become profitable (it's looking promising but who knows). But in the meantime I am paying for all our costs - the mortgage on the house, the old flat, our living expenses and dp is taking money out of the joint account to spend on himself (his phone bill/stuff he buys for his kids etc.).
the issue is that I can easily afford this - I have a ludicrously stressful, high profile job that has been excessively impacted by Covid. I've spent months without a break trying desperately hard to cut costs to avoid making people redundant. And I am now feeling resentful. I heard dp tell his friend that he is living his 'best life'. That he's so in love with me, we have a great relationship (we do), that he's setting up this business and he's never going back to the corporate world again. Except of course that this strategy relies on me supporting him financially until he can contribute which we haven't discussed! I think even if it does do well, with 2 other partners and having to employ more people as it grows, we would be lucky to get to a point where he is contributing enough to cover his own costs.
I do love him and I cannot deny that when he was able to contribute financially, he certainly did and when he stopped being able to, he absolutely upped his game domestically to show he intended to make a contribution financial or not. And he is really working hard on making this business successful. And of course I can afford the position we are in.
But something is nagging me about the possibility that he is never able to contribute financially and I never intended to be in a relationship where I had another dependant. Although I don't think he is chancing his arm, I am slightly concerned about this position lasting forever and him getting his 'best life' while I get a hugely stressful life with the burden of financial responsibility! He has also been dropping hints about letting out the flat - which I can't do as it's my children's home and although they are at university, they come back often (my son has SN and MH issues so is back and forth a bit!) and the house is miles away so not in any way convenient for them and neither of them drive. I don't mind airbnb'ing it but it's not going to work now with Covid and London anyway.
Should I set a time limit within which he should be able to contribute financially? How would you deal with this? Am I being unreasonable?