For those of you saying it’s not her environment. It’s been verified by several psychiatrists and other external agencies her environment IS a trigger. It’s also very apparent that it is as if we are away she’s calmer, in the evenings she has to remove herself for hours as she finds it too overwhelming, by all means happy to discuss opinion on this, in contradiction to any mental health professionals if anyone feels they have a better insight into what’s a major trigger. Her ‘self removal’ then presents a safeguarding issue of course. CAHMS actually told me that this wasn’t their problem at one point - these mental health breakdowns.
I was appointed (not requested) a social worker as I have a pretty severe disability, social worker is next to useless and I need practical support not a box ticked clipboard warrior who can’t get basic facts straight and who in facts hinders any progression. She really is absolutely of no use whatsoever and I fell completely in qualified to be working with me. I say this with all due respect But. in a professional capacity I have seen no evidence of her capability beyond error after error. She seems very nice etc etc. Just seems like another method to delay dealing with the actual issues that need to be urgently addressed. In my opinion.
In regards to the MH label, why did they write that? No idea this was the head teacher and CAHMS when I requested help from the schools via their SEN pathway due to ongoing issues with her father. This was a disaster of course and the schools so-called pastoral care they so proudly display on their website doesn’t exist and the school file now holds false information and I suspect which is why she was the only one who didn’t get accepted to the federal school from her primary school. I asked the school under GDPR for the file as the response I got what which information do you wanted to see. I thought a subject access request was to see what they held! In any case this request is another reason for them to label me as having MH issues of course but I’m beyond caring at this point, the opinion of the school admin.
The council where I live is known for maladministration so hardly surprising. As she’s been off school the LA have not done anything to support her being in school either and they are not held accountable for anything from schooling to housing to MH. One of the MP actually asked why she had been discriminated against when denied a fair access place at a school and the council haven’t bothered to respond. That’s the attitude. Unfortunately education social work housing are all run by the same body, this is obviously not ideal in our case.
It’s right across the board and the treatment I have received from staff is shocking.
I have written to the chief exec as I said and they just redirect me elsewhere or say yes yes we will respond but don’t, the director of housing who’s new manifesto states that these exact issues will be addressed but doesn’t actually action anything for the people who need support. She has been identified as a child in need but nothing at all is done, all
Departments are aware of the seriousness of the situation but refuse, in line with their own policies, to implement the process to support resolving any of the issues caused by specific factors, like housing, like mental health treatment, like fair access to school.
This has been going on for years and I have seen people issue more housing points in a far less precarious situation. This is not hearsay or opinion this is having spoken to local people. The fact that all the evidence submitted is not processed and delays are deliberate means there is an issue and because I have challenged it (politely) I’m branded a ‘troublemaker’ - these are the words of one of my MPs who feigned horror at the situation but only pops up now and then to write a token letter on behalf which is of no value.
I don’t need a GP for my stress levels, stress which is a direct result of dealing with a system designed to break people down, as some on their thread have pointed out, but I do need practical support and for the council to do legally what’s its supposed to do. I should need to have to sink an unprecedented about if money into the legal system for that. It feels like a racket.
The staff at the housing office deliberately block any progression and the mere fact her grandmother is in social work in a certain capacity and having seen the rampant substance abuse and the impact on my daughter is frightening and concerns me that the services are not for for purpose. This is the type mentality I am dealing with in some NOT all instances. The fact there is such disparity between the local and hospital services just validated that there needs to be a better vetting system in place as far as I am concerned.
I am very resilient but starting to realise this system is designed to disempower and force people to be quiet, just back down and accept that this is how things are. If I conducted myself at work the way some of the staff do towards me I would be at a disciplinary so swiftly my feet wouldn’t touch the ground.
So what do I do, how to I fight this as there is a deliberate refusal by the council to do the right thing and because this has been going on for over five years the ombudsman May probably only look at the last year - damning enough in itself but the endemic ‘mischief’ For want of a better word that goes on in my opinion should not be allowed to continue without any accountability. It damages not just my family but the community as a whole in my opinion.
I will caveat all my messages that the other DC has had a 100% different experience thus far and is completely oblivious to the shitstorm we live in. And their school is supposed to be less ‘prestigious’ - there is no prestige in either schools they are just local primary schools, it’s just a snobbery thing which is annoying and amusing at the same time. Would send her private in a second if I could based on our terrible experience.
Do I sound angry and frustrated? Good because I am. I think the patience of a saint would be tested as the shoddy, rude way in which staff think they can treat ‘service users/ customers’, is vile and if one tiny hint of frustration is shown then it’s leapt on used as leverage and an excuse not action anything. it diminishes everyone as far as I am concerned.