Does having a foreskin make an orgasm four time more likely?

[mumtolily]

DH's doctor wants him to have a circumcision but he's not keen and one of the main reasons is he's read that women are four more time likely to orgasm if the bloke has a foreskin!

Anyone test driven both?

Message withdrawn

Can I ask why the doctor is so keen for him to have one, at this stage in his life?

Have tested both

With foreskin was wonderful, I never orgasmed but that was because he was my first lover and I didn't know how, didn't feel secure enough. But I loved the sensation in a different way.

Without, well he was a bastard anyway so I'm biased here, but he always insisted he ouldn't use a durex because the lack of foreskin made the sensation much less (Ah now I see why I got pregnant! And apparently it was MY fault! )
I could not feel him inside me as strongly, maybe just different sized penis, I think they were roughly similar? though -
I did orgasm, but only on top as he was a lazy sod!

I think it varies from man to man
Poor DH, I hope it doesn't hurt too much!

Oh god I killed the thread

Aaargghhh! Of all the threads to kill!!!!

Please someone else come and lay it all on the line, or I shall die of shame at my indiscretion

Message withdrawn

A lot of cock.

It'll hurt a lot more as an adult. I think the 'cleaner' argument is suspect too as an adult, unless one is very lazy...

I'm not surprised he's quite attached to his foreskin [ba-dum-tish] Would frenuloplasty not help his situation. Ahem.

Seems a very odd thing to say. Is thre a medical reason for the operaition? There must be if the doc suggested it.

Shoot me down ladies, but I always thought that most orgasms were from the clitoris and not the vagina, so it shouldn't make a jot of difference.

Think the doc needs to go back to school if he said that....

I've test-driven both.

Let's just say, I prefer uncut all the way!

Oh, no, hls, I can assure you, orgasms are not just from the clitoris.

Some women are not able to orgasm from the vagina, but some more definitely can .

And believe me, there is a difference!

I like both, have had both and soemtimes not even known that i have had a cut one.

Both have pros and cons. i like cut as they seem to be a bit cleaner and they are rumoured to help prevent the spread of hiv.

I think uncut look better but i havent had better orgasms because of one or the other.

Ah Expat, glad you said that. I couldn't at all during sex till I was 31 and finally it happened...definitely no hands involved!

I could never relax enough when they were using their hands etc.

I never believed vaginal orgasm was possible. Now a reformed (and rather surprised) sceptic!

Has anyone seen the American forums for mums, this sort of thread kicks off BIGtime as many of them are having their babies done - it's much more usual there, Expat you would know I guess, being from the US?

It's more usual there indeed, flight, BUT the percentages are now falling, thankfully.

FWIW, my first lover was a European, so I was an early convert to Circumcision Is Not Cool .

Oh I'm very glad to hear it...about the rates dropping. I used to post on Ovusoft and never dared state my opinion, I'm very anti in babies, though if there's a medical reason and/or a choice as OP's husband has, it's different.

True, sometimes it is medically necessary, including in adults.

But when it's not, wahey!

My mother once revealed to me that my father isn't - although he's American, his parents were Mexican.

Talk about TMI!

Blimey!

Have 'tested' both types (XP is Jewish) and one thing I remmeber is that the tip of the head isn't as soft in a circumcised man as in the pre-op version - the foreskin keeps it nice and damp in between use iyswim. I'd keep him uncircumcised if you can but if it's a medical reason, then you may not have a choice. Cleanliness is like everything else - it's down the to the person concerned.

without is much cleaner, but my DH is all in tact. It's how you use it, not whats attached to it! sorry if tmi, but he will find w*nking weird, lots of hand cream or baby lotion involved, avoids friction burns!

have 'test driven' both and found both to be equally pleasurable..

maybe i'm just not fussy?!

my exp used to say he had 5% less than other men - is your dh worried about size?

wanking without one must be horrid

I've test driven both and am suprised to find I'm in a minority of preferring ones who have been snipped.

I think uncut look all baggy and saggy and yeuk... all that movable loose skin.

Although, TBH, neither is a what I would call 'pretty'

I wouldn't have thought there's anything in that tbh surely slippy and stream-lined is a good thing, no?

Anecdotally though, I have heard most women prefer to go down on a circumcised willy, so if he needs the op, perhaps mention that as a little bonus

I am so going to ask my friends on our next night out.