We’ll have to agree to disagree about this, as I don’t think it’s any different from a woman wanking over Cumberbatch or Gosling, as GottadoitGottadoit said. Do you think that’s also creepy and invasive? It IS your absolute right to do so, but I personally don’t think it’s creepy or invasive, just as I don’t think using porn is, even though one is intended as wank fodder and the other isn’t.
I accept that some people will find it creepy, while others won’t, just like some people think certain sexual acts are gross while others think they’re perfectly normal. It’s just a personal preference. Who knows what images, in print or in someone’s imagination, that anyone may wank over? It’s never occurred to me to wank over an FB photo, but I wouldn’t absolutely rule it out. And it’s not that I actively don’t give a shit about the feelings of someone who posted a photo on line, that I may choose to fantasise over. That makes it sound like I disrespect them, but IF I did wank over an on-line image, it wouldn’t occur to me to give any thought to their feelings about it. It would be irrelevant because they wouldn’t know about it, whether they’re an FB user, a fashion model, a sports star, an Instagram poster, etc.
U2HasTheEdge said, “I wouldn't like someone wanking over my FB photos.” I accept that, but she can’t stop it happening and for all she knows, someone may have.
She also said “I expect most people wouldn't like it.” That’s just an opinion, with no evidence to back it up, other than what’s been written by other posters on this thread, which is a very small sample. She may be right, but there’s probably no statistic in existence on this subject.