Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Relationships

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Louise Redknapp isnt following the "perfect wife" script.

105 replies

HelenaDove · 09/10/2017 18:11

www.the-pool.com/news-views/opinion/2017/41/rachael-sigee-on-louise-redknapp-perfect-wife-strictly

Interesting article. Good for her Smile

OP posts:
BoneyBackJefferson · 09/10/2017 19:45

I don't know nor really care why they split, what I do know is that she is milking it for all its worth.

HelenaDove · 09/10/2017 19:48

Well some of the comments here prove some of the points made in the article nicely. It mentions the misogynistic attitudes she has encountered from the press. So im not too surprised to see the odd similar comment here.

OP posts:
WishfulThanking · 09/10/2017 19:50

inlectorecumbit

Well you sound delightful Hmm

Nettletheelf · 09/10/2017 19:50

She didn't have much of a career left by the time she married Redknapp and had kids. She was in an indifferent girl group, then went solo after they fell out, but the solo career was based on cover versions and a tour sponsored by Soft & Gentle deodorant so really wasn't going to go anywhere.

Even after her marriage she hardly dropped out of the spotlight: she and her husband regularly appeared in adverts and she gave many, many interviews to magazines about being a mother and how important family life was to her, etc. etc. I've got a sense that she may even have endorsed a range of baby clothes or written a book on parenting or something. In other words, she was following the Myleene Klass/Jools Oliver 'I still want to be famous but I'm not on telly much so I'd better be a professional famous mummy' strategy.

I suspect it's the old 'can't bear not to be famous any more' story. She puts me in mind of the appalling Emma Bunton actually. Look at meeee! I'm still here, everybody! I'm not going away!!

Louise undoubtedly campaigned to be on Strictly - I don't believe for a second that she was approached previously and turned the show down - and decided to use it as a way back into being a bit famous again, in this case in a touring production of Cabaret. Her agent has probably decided to present it as 'poor downtrodden woman breaks free, isn't she courageous, look, women, here's a celebrity you can get behind if you've got £35 for a ticket, go and see Cabaret NOW!', but I'm not buying the story that her glittering career was curtailed by marriage and her selfless devotion to her family.

This sort of thing cheapens the experience of women who are really downtrodden in their relationships.

theaveragewife · 09/10/2017 19:54

This sort of thing cheapens the experience of women who are really downtrodden in their relationships.

Instead of pitting one against the other, would it not be possible to believe both situations are challenging in their own ways? People and relationships are multi-faceted, but allowing women to see that this can be an outcome and pushing for equality within the home is surely a good thing?

A lot of your post seems to be opinions rather than facts, if a woman says that's the way she felt then why not believe her? It doesn't demean experiences of others, there's room for everyone!

Landed · 09/10/2017 19:56

All nettletheelf said.

Vintagebeads · 09/10/2017 19:58

See for me,I read that as she wanted to do something that would take up "family" time,and he thought it was a good idea and when she had done it he wanted to have another baby.
To me it seems she wanted a career away from the home and he didn't.She felt she couldn't be married and have the career.
I don't see what she has done wrong.Except talking to the press about.She should keep quiet as he is.
But I don't for one minute think JR wanted her out having a busy career.

roundaboutthetown · 09/10/2017 19:58

Sounds exactly like a midlife crisis to me!

pinkingshears · 09/10/2017 20:01

I googled and it is.
Dont really know her / the story but thought the undies were nice.
I have been looking for a similar suspender belt and wondered how to find out where it was from.
(prob misses point of thread).

theaveragewife · 09/10/2017 20:01

Women supporting women...lovely Hmm

ssd · 09/10/2017 20:03

agree with nettletheelf

BadTasteFlump · 09/10/2017 20:03

Imo that article misses the point.

If a woman is in a good relationship, her partner will support her and try to help her have the life she wants, not hinder.

So the bottom line is she wasn't in a good relationship, it has bugger all to do with sequins.

ssd · 09/10/2017 20:03

keep trying theaveragewife, no one's buying it

GabsAlot · 09/10/2017 20:04

never liked her she thought she was a great singer shes not

strictly strikes again!

HelenaDove · 09/10/2017 20:05

YY theaveragewife

OP posts:
ssd · 09/10/2017 20:07

oh yes, the strictly curse!!

better turn them down next time they phone me then....

Oblomov17 · 09/10/2017 20:07

Their marriage was always questioned by his supposed infidelity, wasn’t it?

MsDugong · 09/10/2017 20:08

Mum. That reads like PR re-writing of history.
She worked during their marriage. They both gave interviews during their marriage about how important it was to them both that they both worked and she wasn't a SAHM. Her career became relatively low profile in terms of media coverage and frequency but she did presenting work, as well as some of the things mentioned here. She painted this as her choice. Of course, the part about choice may not have been entirely true...she may have felt pressure and therefore is now genuinely rediscovering herself. It may be she and Jamie now want entirely different things. There's nothing wrong with that but why has this article painted her as a SAHM when she was previously keen to project herself as a working mum.

A marriage break up is always sad and I hope they both find a way to coparent amicably and be happy. I have no opinion on what Louise does with her life. I just think this article is a pile of shit.

GabsAlot · 09/10/2017 20:09

jr got ribbed on leagu of their own about the strictly curse now its happened!

hop thy dont carry on about it

GetYourRosariesOffMyOvaries · 09/10/2017 20:10

What vile, cunty comments!

Raisedbyguineapigs · 09/10/2017 20:26

I got the impression that all the stuff she did was based on her relationship with Jamie. All the presenting stuff was both of them together and the terrible holiday ads were all of them as a happy family. I'm not aware of anything she did off her own bat. I also heard the cheating rumours, and his parents sticking their oar in make me think she just was not supported when she wanted to do something of her own and just had enough. The 'Strictly curse' only happens where there are problems in the relationship in the first place. And I do agree with the article re: Daisy Lowe. She's youngish and models underwear, so she must have tempted the bored housewife into her debauched lesbian lifestyle!

MuseumOfCurry · 09/10/2017 20:38

Woman stars on reality television show and doesn't want to return to normalcy. Fair enough. I don't see any reason to dress it up as some kind of meaningful (feminist?) journey.

It's normal to experience doubt and boredom in a marriage. If you can make it through the marital malaise in one piece, you might find something better than you expected.

Tinycitrus · 09/10/2017 20:47

I don't think it's meaningful either.

She's a wealthy woman and has the freedom to make certain choices and that's what she's done.

It says nothing to me about my life.

Walkingdead11 · 09/10/2017 20:48

The fact is that many women have these feelings and do lose their identity when they get married and have children. She is experiencing some if that freedom again and I say good luck to her!! There are some rumours that Jamie is quite controlling and of course the cheating ?? All the vile comments about her age and looks reek of misogyny.

CashewNut11 · 09/10/2017 20:51

I remember her 'launch' outfit for Strictly being the opposite of the usual glittery, sequiny, fitted shimmery outfits the women usually wear. It was drop waisted and I think, below the knee. She said at the time she didn't want to go the clingy outfit route as she felt she was 'past it'.

I got the impression she was really drawn to the dancing but conflicted by the outfits as she did not have the body confidence.

I loved watching her transformation - and did wonder how the ripples from the changes would affect her family. When people change it is common that others close to them want them to 'change back!' because of how the shift in role, position etc affects everything and everyone. (Ever lost lots of weight and had 'friends' try to smother you with cake?)

It's a shame that it looks as if she's had little support from her husband...

I think she's made a difficult and brave choice, but isn't that what MNetters would advise someone in her position to do?

Swipe left for the next trending thread