There we go with the assumptions.
I don't think that I was rude at all; I took issue, perfectly civilly, with the phrase 'moping about', pointing out that a) I hadn't been and b) it was 15 odd years ago!
I don't think you do understand at all. I will, if I may, gently point you towards Margarets post. I think she explained better than I could. Unless you think she is also 'hard work.'
WHY do people come into three threads just to inform the OP they are an awful person I wonder?
Napoleon, it was the first example that sprang to mind, perhaps because that was the first time I had experienced being at the receiving end of people's pity - and it was - I gave the volunteers example as I didn't know that person at all, which was why I was trying to explain it wasn't a case of 'I don't know her so well but she seems lovely!' It was more in the spirit of 'gosh, a young person alone at Christmas - I shall invite her!'
Now I am not saying that these people aren't some of the kindest, most genuine and sincere people I know. They are. But as such, I would prefer to know them and like them as an equal as someone sagely put it, not an inferior - which you are when you're receiving charity.
It's the personal as opposed to the anonymous I suppose. If a friend of mine needs money and I insist she takes some from me that is because she is my friend. If a stranger needs money and I give it to them that is because of charity.
I have never asked for money but in terms of emotional support, I do sometimes feel that people give it kindly and genuinely but - charitably. Not as friends but as superiors might.