In other words, it totally ignores the lack of consent and treats the rape as consensual cheating.
YY!
And it's not about telling women or married women what to do, or where to go, or trying to police their behaviour. Although there has been an ABUNDANCE of that, on this very thread!! Plenty of poster stated it was inappropriate for her to be out with another man, even in a platonic way!
Nobody in their right mind blames a rape victim for the attack, and nobody here has done that.
When you focus your attentions on the behaviour of the victim, you are making her responsible for her rape & taking away the responsibility from the rapist. THAT is why people are seeing victim blaming in posts where people claim not to be blaming her. Fwiw, I am sure those of you posting that you are not blaming her, are not blaming her...it is just that your posts are concentrating on her behaviour, rather than the rapists, and that is where you get into dangerous territory. By pulling apart what she did that night, you ARE placing some of the blame on her.
The focus of this thread has predominately been what the op did that night & focusing on her rebuilding the trust in her marriage (ffs), not on the rape.
Which is why many of us are angry! In the post where op updated that she spoke again to her dh, she is STILL questioning HER behaviour, so she still feels partly to blame, and much of that is partly thanks to this thread & the rape myths being peddled here.
He blamed his wife for her own rape and made a big song and dance about "working through it", ie as an infidelity. ... I can't see how you can justify that response without ultimately blaming the victim.
Agree!
If you would end your marriage over a comment like that then of course that's your business. I certainly would. Perhaps not straight away, but after a while, when I came to see that comment for what it was (blaming me for 'wanting' sexual contact, blaming me for welcoming it, blaming me for appearing available, for 'tricking' the rapist, blaming me for my rape) his arse would be handed to him.
I don't wear a wedding ring. That doesn't mean I am inviting any unwanted sexual contact from anyone.
Or is that the 'new thing'...if you don't wear your wedding ring how is a man to know not to rape you? So pleased the men I know don't think that lack of wedding ring = opens door for consent.
But I can't accept that this goes without comment in the majority of relationships. It's called trust!
I was 16 when I shared a hotel room with a man (separate beds) that I had never met before, but that my mum's new (about 3/4 months) partner knew (only 2 rooms left, mum HAD to share with her partner & left me with a stranger at 16 - just one more way she fucked up, she of course, should have made them share & been with me) I didn't get raped. Because he wasn't a rapist. He had plenty of opportunity. He was a great guy, also saw how inappropriate it was & after lights out felt uncomfortable enough about it, he went to sleep in his car!
I wonder if you would all pull apart my behaviour if I confessed to having been raped by him that night.
Will you answer my question now and name the posters who blame the op for being raped I have posted down thread (Sun 11-Jan-15 14:22:18), a few sentences taken from various posters who place the blame for the rape at op's door, by way of 'I told you so' type comments.
As I have said before, AS SOON as you start focusing on the victims behaviour, you are placing the responsibility on the victim, and taking it way from the rapist, this is victim blaming. Sure, no one has said 'op, you caused yourself to be raped' but they have placed the blame on her by analysing her actions of that night.
But no one forced me to go to his house alone and drink so much I passed out. A decent guy wouldn't have done what he did but I was stupid to put myself in that situation in the first place. No no no & a thousand times NO!!!
Blame is when you say 'it was your fault' still right? No. Blame is when you analyse the victims behaviour. Ask her to justify her behaviour, ask her if she was wearing a wedding ring, tell her she sent out the 'wrong massages', tell her she shouldn't have gone for a drink with a man while married,
Because by doing all that (which has been done many times on this thread) puts the responsibility for the rape on the victim, you are saying "if only you hadn't done x (drank), y (gone to a club with him) & z (taken off your wedding ring), you wouldn't have been raped" puts the blame on the victim & takes it away the responsibility from the rapist.
Ergo, you are blaming the victim.