My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you need help urgently or expert advice, please see our domestic violence webguide and/or relationships webguide. Many Mumsnetters experiencing domestic abuse have found this thread helpful: Listen up, everybody

Relationships

I've lost a parent but gained an inheritance and a shit load of guilt.

63 replies

PrivateP · 21/09/2012 20:27

Name changer here. Being eaten up with worry and need some advice.

I had a pretty miserable, unsettled childhood and made my own way in the world both emotionally and financially. One of my parents had a mental illness, which added to this. However, in later life my family grew closer and things really were looking up. Unfortunately this was short lived as one of my parents died suddenly. Having to support my surviving parent, who is the one with the mental illness, has been difficult at times. I have young kids of my own and a stressful job. I suppose I haven't really dealt with the loss.

Anyway, my parents were exceptionally frugle and latterly became wealthy due to some shrewd decisions and admittedly, trampling on a few people. As they didn't have a will, the estate is left between my surviving parent, myself and my sibling. My dilemma is that my sibling has taken it for granted that we'll hand over our inheritance to our surviving parent, despite the fact that they've got a fairly huge chunk and a house. Part of me wants to hand mine over too - but the other part can't help thinking that I could put away some cash for my DC's education and pay a chunk of my mortgage. On the one hand I'm fairly sure if they had had a will it would leave everything to the surviving spouse, on the other hand the parent I lost wouldn't grudge me or my DC the money. I haven't spoken to anyone about this and it's making me ill with worry.

What would you do?

OP posts:
Report
tiredofwaitingforitalltochange · 22/09/2012 09:17

Never pass inheritance up the survival chain, purely for inheritance tax purposes, you risk paying twice.

This is good advice.

Report
marriedinwhite · 22/09/2012 09:23

I think you and your sibling, together with your surviving parent if they have the capacity and are willing, should make an appointment to see a good solicitor and take sound advice about how the estate should be divided to ensure the best outcome for all parties, the best financial planning for all parties, to minimise the impact of IHT in the future, to assist your remaining parent in making a will for the sake of both of you and for sorting out any issues in relation to power of attorney and funding the care of your remaining parent in the future. If you and your sibling have difficulty talking, if the estate is large, then deal with it using a legal framework to support everyone involved for the reassurance and security of everyone. I don't think it would be wrong to take the money because you aren't taking it; you are receiving what you are entitled to under the rules of inheritance.


Sorry for your loss OP.

Report
CogitoErgoSometimes · 22/09/2012 11:09

I haven't read the whole thread but I would be honest with the surviving parent, say that you need the money and then keep your inheritance. The whole point of wills is to remove ambiguities and woolly things like 'expectations'. If the deceased wanted everything to go to the surviving partner (and I wasn't aware that it didn't), they should have made a simple will to that effect. If your sibling wants to hand over their share, that's their decision. If the surviving parent will be extremely well provided for after you have taken your share (and assuming they don't have to start selling things off in order to give you the money) then there's not much of a moral case against it.

But be up front about your intentions so that no-one can say you were underhand. And then, of course, make a will yourself.

Report
edam · 22/09/2012 14:51

Cretaceous, I hope you've made a will? Everyone should, but as you refer to dp not dh, it's especially important.

Report
Cretaceous · 22/09/2012 16:42

Edam, yes, I certainly have made a will, and so has my DP. But we aren't married, so we are aware of that. I think that a lot of married people assume everything will go to their surviving spouse. I guess that's what the OP's dad did, and the OP says he would have left everything to his wife, if he had made a will.

I totally agree with marriedinwhite, except re the bit about taking the money, of course. And doesn't this just totally underline the importance of making a will.

I think that it's a bit sad that people decide that because someone is getting older (and in this case, the mum's only in her 50s, and has been scrimping and saving over the years), then they need the money less than someone who is younger and who has children. It might be that the mum would be happy for the OP to have the money. But she's just lost her husband, and to discover that one of your daughters is just going to keep the money because they feel they could put it to good use - I just think it's a bit upsetting.

Report
BackforGood · 22/09/2012 16:57

But it's said further up the threas, that, as well as money, the surviving parent has still inherited 2 houses. This doesn't seem to be a case of keeping money that will then leave a parent in poverty.

Report
BackforGood · 22/09/2012 16:57

thread

Report
Cretaceous · 22/09/2012 17:19

But they were married, so really the surviving parent is losing something that she thought was hers to start with, through the marriage. She and her husband earned it though scrimping and saving etc. Maybe I just identify with the scrimping and saving here, but it would just upset me. And if the dad was still alive, would the OP have thought to go along and ask for a share of it? No, because it wasn't hers. It's just fallen into her lap because her dad died comparatively young and didn't think to leave a will. It's almost like everyone thinks it's just the dad's money, but surely in life it was thought of as shared.

Anyway, OP I don't want to upset you, because you are going through a stressful, horrid time. But I just feel this is going to lead to more upset, by just keeping the money. You need a proper upfront family discussion, and it would give your mum an opportunity, perhaps, to offer the money, making her feel good about the situation, and also then give your sibling the opportunity to have some of the money too.

Report
azazello · 22/09/2012 20:05

I agree with Married. If you have qualms, go and see a financial advisor or solicitor and talk through the implications for tax/ care needs etc.

Incidentally, I find the comments that it is 'right' to give your share to the surviving parent interesting. dH and I have wills leaving our shares in the house etc to our children but with the other having a right to use them. I know too many people who've had one parent die, the other marry again and everything eventually going to the children of the new partner because they didn't sort out their wills which is unlikely to be what anyone intended.

Report
edam · 22/09/2012 20:21

quite, aza. If (God forbid) I died and dh remarried, I'd hate some stepmother to waltz off with my half of the house (or proceeds of) rather than ds!

Report
BackforGood · 22/09/2012 21:24

Same here aza and Edam.
dh and I have mirror wills, but they acknowledge that half of what we own is mine and half of it is his. When either of us dies, half will go to the children once the surviving one no longer needs to live in the home.

Report
greyvix · 22/09/2012 21:36

As I understand it, you avoid too much inheritance tax by leaving money to your children as well as your partner.
It would defeat the object to give this money to your surviving parent, particularly if they don't need it. I agree with the comments above; my parents have this arrangement: my siblings and I would inherit, but make sure that the surviving parent was comfortable financially.

Report
springlamb · 22/09/2012 21:56

Are you quite sure that (a) your father didn't intend for exactly this to happen and (b) that your mother wasn't made aware at some point that this would be the situation?

I ask that as my father died intestate and so the law dictated who inherited. It meant that some people were rightly included in the distribution without argument, whereas if he had tried to cover those people in a will, some family members would have caused uproar. I like to think he did it deliberately especially since there were some other anomalies in his affairs that made me believe he was craftier than we thought!

I would err on keeping the money out of your surviving parent's estate and so am glad you've decided to keep it. It's not like you're planning to spend it all on designer shoes and handbags. When the time came, your father may well have helped out with university costs etc had he lived.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.