I have resisted responding to your threads PBR and Anti-D, but feel I have to.
I read your posts yesterday, and although I think you show a regrettable lack of courtesy in continuing to pursue your own agenda on this thread, it is a public forum and as such. Is open to comments from whomever chooses to participate. I reported your longer post to MN on the basis that it was potentially libellous.
Is it reasonable to warn people that AA, which by its very nature will include vulnerable people, may attract those who wish to exploit? Of course. As other PPs have said, however, those who go to AA are at least attempting to address problems and lifestyle choices. Which in themselves are damaging to their children. This isn't an alternative family trip out when the soft play looks busy.
Saying that any organisation is deliberately recruiting children for the purposes of abuse is something very different. Such allegations belong to the police, and making them in a place such as this is potential libel. I am not disputing your allegtions. I have no way of knowing if youn people have been abused as a consequan e of their parents' involvement with AA, although tragically I think it's inevitable. Fewer than those harmed in some way because their parents drink? Who knows, and it's a tasteless calculation toeven consider.
I have no axe to grind. I have never been to an AA meeting. This is not an AA thread. It has, however, helped me and many others to address our own misuse of alcohol and thereby substantially increase our children's welfare.
If, as you claim, you are motivated solely to protect children, then perhaps you will consider the harmful effects of threatening the source of support for parents which this thread represents.
Apologies for typos. Am off to enjoy a hangover-free Saturday lie in and day with my young children, which a few months ago seemed unattainable.