Here's another one for my affair-surviving friends on the board (and by surviving here I mean anyone that is still alive) - what's your take on the importance of the kind of affair, EA/PA/EA-PA?
I ask because I'm having some doubts after a first meeting with a marriage counsellor yesterday. H and I both really liked her and want to continue with her despite elevated cost. But I got to thinking last night about something she said - she asked my husband what kind of affair it was he had, romantic or purely sexual?
The answer is purely sexual (lasted about 5 weeks while I was away, finished before I returned because he was feeling crap about it). She said to me (before I explained the wider context to our relationship, for which I got a lot of sympathy) and said that well, a sexual affair is "just a scratch on the relationship". She wasn't saying that it was justified, or that I was stupid to feel terrible about it in the immediate aftermath. But I did take it a bit as "well this shouldn't be too difficult to get over". Bearing in mind also that I'm in South America where culturally quite accepted.
So I'm not only wondering about her as a counsellor, but more importantly about my reaction. It's true that the context for my husband's sex-only affair was a pretty awful one (supported him for the entire almost 11 years of our relationship, thus becoming resentful and cold with him), but if I leave aside the other factors for just one second, should my reaction to a purely sexual affair be softer than to one where there is real feeling involved?
I have thought on occasion how an EA would be easier in fact. I have slept with my husband a few times since discovery and end up feeling dirty afterwards because of where his "privates" have been. Using condoms (as we now have to) reminds me of how he used them with her. I am finding all that VERY hard to deal with. But I know so many say that an EA is much harder to deal with. Until you've been there, it's hard to know.
Anyway, appreciate your ideas here, thanks ladies!