De-lurking from this and other threads. I haven't listened to the Archers for ages now but did a couple of episodes recently and last night's one. The reality is that it's unrealistic to expect storylines to reflect real life because A, it just isn't possible with e.g. A DV storyline as on the whole they play out over years not weeks/months, and B, it's entertainment, and there's only so much of someone beating the crap out of their partner which can be sold as entertaining.
This was never going to end realistically. No storyline of this type has in the history of broadcasting, to expect the archers to be the first was naive at best.
WRT charities who benefit from these storylines, they are being entirely disingenuous to suggest that these types of storylines raise awareness, it's about money for them and nothing more. The fact that someone from WA and refuge have been happy to go on record to suggest that leaving is the most dangerous time for a victim to leave in response to said victim stabbing her aggressor to death says it all.
I think that it's perfectly reasonable to suggest that last night's episode was crap purely because it really just was shite. But unreasonable to expect that the story could play out realistically.
Also, for people saying Kirsty should have been waiting outside that isn't realistic either. If anyone posted on here that they were worried about a friend who was at risk from her partner everyone would advise her to keep herself safe as well. No-one would advocate waiting outside for the friend to leave in case she was at risk. No-one.