...who post on Radio Addicts threads on MN and are willing to admit their age? That was a question that was answered by a sample of 51 on the Archers thread which started 3rd November. But I thought I'd restate the results here for posterity (and easy future reference). _Age_..._Frequency_ (1 face = 1 listener) 25-29 [hmm][hmm] 30-34 [hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm] 35-39 [hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm] 40-44 [hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm] 45-49 [hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm] 50-54 [hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm] 55-59 [hmm][hmm][hmm] 60-64 [hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm][hmm] 65-69 [hmm] The average (mean) age is 46.1 and the ages range from 28 to 66. I've changed the smileys to more sceptical faces as that seems to capture the current mood. [grin] With the exception of *footle* who was the oldest person to reveal their age (which explains why the sample size has increased to 51), *I did not collect any ages mentioned on the main Archers thread after 5 November 9:50am (see link below)*. The main reason for a separate thread was just to preserve the results of this nearly pointless exercise. However, if you want your age to be added - or to reveal you are younger than 28 or older than 66 - then I ^might^ get round to adding you to the graph, _if you post below starting your post in the following format (makes it easy to find):_ *Age=*^XX^ (no spaces) [[http://www.mumsnet.com/Talk/radio_addicts/2225850-Dont-blame-it-on-a-Grundy-dont-blame-it-on-Route-B-dont-blame-it-on-Sean-OC-blame-it-on-the-badgers-Discuss-The-Archers-of-Prudhoe-here?pg=12]]