I'm in the process of buying a flat (Victorian terraced garden) and the only thing that caused me any alarm on the survey was the damp, so I followed up with a specialist damp and timber survey.
The damp and timber survey revealed a likely leak due to a saturated interior wall - no evidence that it's coming from pipework in the flat above and the vendors have already had a CCTV drainage survey in the last couple of years so the suspicion is that it's a mains water leak.
My vendors have responded to my survey my having two independent specialists round and reported that 'both specialists have identified the scope of work is internal only; hey assessed the scope of work to be localised damp treatment, re-plastering and damp proofing. Neither identified any evidence of an active mains water leak'
I'm a bit lost here. My damp survey was done by a specialist surveyor, whereas these opinions are from damp treatment works companies. The vendors haven't given me any kind of report or justification for the 'no reason to suspect a leak' opinion, only quotes for minor remedial works that they are willing to knock off the cost of the property.
I want to know for sure one way or another before I exchange as it seems foolhardy to take their word for it and a small (£3k) price reduction when I have a paid-for report that suggests a bigger problem.
Any advice on how to get to the bottom of it, or find a way through it as quickly as possible?