My DS started primary school last year and I enrolled him in a local karate club around the same time.
He's a mixed race child living in a predominately white area (small village). There's already been a racist incident at school, but school dealt with it brilliantly. Can't fault them.
Anyway, I bring up my son to defend himself, not to cower away from bullies (not being bullied and never has, just want to pre-empt).
That's why I send him to karate (which he really enjoys).
Meanwhile, he keeps saying kids at his school are not allowed to hit
back (in self-defence). Just to be clear, I'd never condone him being an aggressor but I've always told him if someone hits him first then he must hit back and that I'd tell the school teachers exactly this and explain that he learns karate precisely for self-defence.
Karate instructor told me that his teenage son (a black belt) was set upon by 5 boys from his school and fought off every single one of them, some got broken teeth etc but the school STILL blamed him. For defending himself against 5 bullies! This father told the school they're talking rubbish and that he'll defend his son's right to stand up to bullies.
I couldn't agree more but get frustrated when my son say things like "we're not allowed to hit back" or "we just have to tell a teacher.". IMO, bullies NEED to be hit back.
So if you're not "allowed" to hit back in the event of bullying, you cower from them or simply allow them to do what they want? Struggling to see any logic in this!
Do ALL teachers believe the best thing is not to hit back??