We are in an area with lots of good/outstanding state primary schools but also a number of private primary schools. Lots of people use them because they “they are better because they are private “ or because they like the smaller classes and extra curricular acitivities.
DD attends a state primary. Her school is at the top of the borough’s medium school sport teams, they have a huge musical Departement in addition to privately paid lessons. They do at least one trip per term in relation to their term topic, they even had normal science, history, French, geography and music lesson despite practicing for SATS.
We pay extra for some sport as DD doesn’t do well on team/ball sport and her favourites are not generally taught on school like theatre production and horse riding.
We go to museums, take her on trips abroad and in the UK, we talk about news at home,
I don’t think there is a difference between a decent state school pupil which parents interested in education and a private school one.
Secondary - the majority In our area are selective, DD, due to ADHD borderline, has no chance in sitting any test. The non selective are good up to GCSE level, 6th form is bad due to lack of subjects, most of them are far behind in local league tables from state secondaries.
If anybody goes private you need to think of why, to keep up with the Joneses? To ensure a good education because state options are rubbish? Because your child is good and a private may stretch it further?
I wouldn’t be happy with 2-3 hours homework each day for my child as some PPs said they know private pupil have. I want my child to also enjoy life, having hobbies outside school like Scouts.
What would happen if your child wouldn’t make the cut at an entrance exam? How would you feel? Will you automatically think your child is on the way to eternal doom?