Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Primary education

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

my child reads and write at top level, but her Phonics group is not!!!

348 replies

B4r4joon · 10/12/2012 15:12

My daughter is a very bright child at Y1...she is reading and writing very well...however when it came to grouping them, she is not been located in the top group in Phonics, although she reads the same level and writes the same as those children on the top group. This is very confusing for her amd me, as I dont understand on what basis this happened. She can be at times shy and she observes her peers very well and learn from them as she is bi-lingual. In the gropu she is in now, the difference between the level she reads and the level of some other children is huge...perhaps 7 colour reading band!!!

This has affecte dmy childs confidence as she thinks she hasnt been good enough, or why she is reading the same book as her reading partner, and he/she is in another group. ALl confusing for me, I am gonna talk to the teacher tomorrow, and I dont know how to say it. i dont want to convey that I dont trust their judgment, but this is gonna hold my child back and crashes her confidence, as the groups are gonna stay the same until the end of teh year! Can I ask the teacher to move my child to the other group? Is Phonics the knowledge that they learn to apply to their writing and reading, so how can she read and write higher than her phonics knowledge? She is already reading sounds that she has not been officially taught, by working it out on herself....

OP posts:
Feenie · 15/12/2012 22:06

What you're suggesting though is actually limiting a child's learning, learnandsay. Not something most teachers would be comfortable doing.

learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:07

Well, yes. I can't see how that one is going to turn out well!

learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:08

Maybe, Feenie. But at least we're studying soldiers. Before that we were having some kind of a fight. It's progress of a sort.

Feenie · 15/12/2012 22:11

I can see why you think that. But it really wouldn't be a good thing for the child.

learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:12

And a better alternative is what?

mrz · 15/12/2012 22:13

and the child at the back of the class thinks to him/herself he gets to do what he likes for being naughty Hmm think I'll try that

Feenie · 15/12/2012 22:15

To gently open up the child's horizons - by many means, but not by colluding with him to see that you can always get your own way if you really want to. It's not a helpful lesson, and the lack of meaningful learning does him more of a disservice really.

mrz · 15/12/2012 22:15

not letting the child thump thump whack whack in the first place

learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:18

Possibly, mrz. I suppose it depends on what we mean by do what he likes. We're studying the Great Fire of London. Initially the child doesn't want to join in. But now he's joining in because soldiers played an important role in trying to manage the fire. So he's joining in as a normal member of the class. Sounds OK to me.

learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:19

And how do we stop him thumping and whacking?

Feenie · 15/12/2012 22:19

For now!

simpson · 15/12/2012 22:27

If he is in yr2 and learning the Great Fire of London, he should already know that he cannot thump and whack at school.

simpson · 15/12/2012 22:29

It's like teaching a child thats its ok to have a hissy fit and they will get their on way....

learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:31

OK, but this is a hypothetical child. Let's suppose his mother has just moved him from the school where the headmistress supplied violent children with plimsolls to throw at staff. And he has no idea that attacking his teachers is wrong!

mrz · 15/12/2012 22:32

by what he likes I mean "soldiers" only child 2 only likes moshi monsters and power rangers ...
A gentle reminder of the consequences if he continues thumping and whacking and a few minutes to consider his options out of thumping and whacking distance

Feenie · 15/12/2012 22:32

Takes Wine off learnandsay.

Grin
learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:38

But surely the easiest option out of whacking and thumping distance is to stare out of the window and not do any boring history.

I'd struggle with moshi monsters and power rangers, but try to offer outlaws, mythical monsters and heroes as a substitute. But if it absolutely had to be moshi monsters and power rangers I think I'd be defeated.

learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:41

Or, rather than give up straight away, I'd try to place a power ranger in the role of the Duke of York in Pudding Lane commanding the soldiers to pull the houses down. If that idea fell flat on its face then I'd consider defeat.

mrz · 15/12/2012 22:44

Staring out the window is rewarded by doing the work in his own time so no breaks

learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:46

No breaks?! Gimme my ffin break, you
thwack, thwack.

mrz · 15/12/2012 22:48

no break for the rest of the week

learnandsay · 15/12/2012 22:50

Just you try and stop me going out!
thwack, crunch!!

What are you lot staring at?!!

Crack, crunch.

Haberdashery · 15/12/2012 22:54

The thing is, learnandsay, that if you have to go to the lengths of bringing power rangers and Moshi Monsters into it you've basically lost the battle before you've started. The great fire is not actually boring or engaging material.

mrz · 15/12/2012 22:54

You've not been in many primary schools have you learnandsay

Haberdashery · 15/12/2012 22:55

Sorry - that should say UNengaging.