I have posted previously regarding my 6 and a half year old son, now at the end of year one. He has been refusing to write at school as he has lost his confidence in writing and has been hiding his work so that it cannot be displayed on the wall as he believes that it is the worst in the class. He is at a state school, ofsted apparently think it is outstanding and he has an NQT.
He refuses to write at home but has just come home with all his work books for the year so we can now see what he has been doing. We cannot read anything he writes because he reverses all his letters and the size and layout is so poor with words split between lines etc. If it were not dated we could not tell which work was done at the start and which at the end of year as there does not appear to be any difference to us.
We were therefore expecting his end of year report to state that he was below average for writing and to offer additional help for next year. His report has graded his writing as a 1B which they state is average. It was titled writing for a range of purposes. This has not been inflated by his reading or other subjects as they have been graded separately.
Surely school would not grade his writing higher than actual just to prevent showing a huge disparity between the grade for reading and writing or for any other reason? Is it possible to be graded a 1B with totally illegible writing or could it perhaps be based on his dictating work? How important should handwriting be to this grade?
Many thanks