I get really irritated by boob nazi reactions, because I firmly believe that everyone has the right to decide on their own bodily autonomy. I don't get how women who are pro-choice on abortion can be so prescriptive on breastfeeding - whose breasts are they, anyway? Nobody has the right to an opinion except the owner of the boobs in question, and after nurturing a baby in her womb for 9 months, followed by labour and birth, IMO every mother on the planet has earned the right to decide on what feels right for her without anyone daring to imply selfishness. Formula sustains life and most babies given it are just fine, no question. But at the same time, I wish people didn't sugar coat about the differences between breast and formula. An informed choice requires just that: information. And in the words of the New Scientist:
Would we knowingly substitute any other complete biological system of nourishment (blood for example) with one that contained no living cells, no tissue-specific growth enhancers, no immune system modulators, no inflammatory response inhibitors plus a massive dose of non-human protein? And then give it to our children for the first six months of life when their immune systems are at their most under-developed and sensitive and consider it a mystery when they become ill?
Issue 2445 of New Scientist magazine, 01 May 2004, page 32*
Formula feeding increases the risks of childhood leukaemia by a third, increases very significantly the risks of crohn's disease, diabetes, ceoliac disease, eczema, and asthma, and knocks a (disputed, but always statistically significant) number of IQ points off. Breastmilk has as many white blood cells in as blood - it's made up of living human tissue, just as blood is. Breastmilk is, literally, alive. 80% of the cells in it fight disease in some way - some kill cancer cells. Breastmilk has proteins that are uniquely well digested by the human gut, and fatty acids uniquely able to nurture brain and organ development. It's a pain-killer, a laxative, and a sedative. It decreases the risk of obesity and poor eyesight. It contains a naturally occurring opiod that apparently helps the baby bond - that's why a breastfed baby has that stoned, blissed out floppiness at the end of a satisfying feed. It contains growth hormones, as well as antibodies from every disease you ever had and every vaccination you ever received. Most startlingly of all, several studies have shown that if your baby catches a bug of some kind, and breastfeeds, their saliva transmits the info to the breast, and your immune system promptly manufactures the antibodies required and sends them right back via the milk.
For the record, before I had my son I was planning to try to breastfeed, but had no issues with formula if I hated bf, or it didn't work out. I just had no clue on the seriousness of the difference between the two. As it happens he has oral problems that have made breastfeeding horrendously difficult - and at 3 months, I'm still pumping the most of his feeds, as he rarely latches well enough to satisfy him, or me to bear it. It's frustrating, boring, at times uncomfortable, and I can only do it because he's my first and I have a lot of help from my Mum. But yes, I honestly do believe breastmilk is that much better. It's worth it to me, now I know the difference. There's a reason the NHS pushes breast-feeding so hard, and formula companies are banned by law from advertising formula for babies under 6 months.