You're still wilfully misunderstanding me.
I completely understand you. My disagreement isn't because I don't get it.
You're making generalised points about boys and claiming it's definitely nature and not nurture.
Yes, I and other posters are highlighting the general differences we see between our boys and girls. I could give you many other things that make my three children specifically different from each other. The things we are bringing up, are what we all see as the blanket differences, generally between (young) boys and girls, thats sort of the point.
"You then describe how you know this is true by referring to specific behaviours to highlight difference. I'm really not attacking your parenting btw if that's what it sounds like.*
They're not "specific" behaviours to my specific child. That's why they mirror the behaviours of other posters descriptions. I don't feel you're attacking my parenting at all. It's not my parenting that has generated these differences, nor do I see anything wrong with them.
Nobody is denying the differences. Many are trying to explain that these differences cannot just be attributed to nature. None of us parent in a vacuum.
Actually, parented in a vacuum is pretty much exactly what DTwins have experienced. They are almost 2. Born just before lockdown. And because of the last two years, they've experienced almost nothing externally or socially.
But you have a sample of two
Three. And what is your point with this? My sample of two, and the next posters sample of two (saying the same thing), and the next, and the next... are what makes the general population.