If your first is,early or late are you likley to be the same 2nd time?

[Emsgale]

Well my dd was 7 days early by scan date and the midwife thought at least 14 days early due to all the white waxy stuff she was covered in etc.
im 33+2 and due on 7th april and the midwife said im unlikley to go over as first was early so this,one should be.
you tend to stick to a pattern ie if late always late if early always early! Does this ring true to others??
Xx

No, dc 1 was 12 days early dc2 was 12 days late. I reckon i should be on time with this one

no

DD was 3 weeks early

DS was bang on time (give or take 15 mins)

No Dc1 4 weeks early, Dc2 3 weeks early, DC3 10 weeks early, DC4 induced at 2.5 wks early.

Baby no 4 and the longest I'd ever been pregnant. Huh!

DS1 two weeks early spontaneous labour. DD1 one day over after a sweep on due date. DD2 two weeks early but she was induced in hosp so doesn't count!

Oh poo I was hoping for lots of yesses across the board lol! im so impatient!
Thank you for all the replies!!
Xx

A yes here (sort of) I was one day early with DS and bang on with DD

For me my 1st was a week late and my 2nd 9 days early.

Oh that's all good to hear to hear for me!!! DS was 11 days late and was induced...hoping this one makes a slightly early appearance