i quoted this bit
"I am pleased that following a positive response to our consultation, and overwhelming public support, friends supporting one another with unpaid childcare will be exempt from the registration and inspection process. This amendment has been made to ensure that hard-working parents are not penalised for supporting their friends with unpaid childcare.
to my council when I enquired about my situation and they stated it was not in force and my friend will have to pay £200 to go on the voluntary register to look after her in my home WRONG - SHE CAN BE AN UNREGISTERED NANNY BUT YOU WON'T BE ABLE TO USE VOUCHERS OR TAX CREDITS
or
train as a child minder neither of which we can afford. She also said that it would be benfit fraud for my friend if we share child care???? I DON'T KNOW HOW IT WOULD BE BENEFIT FRAUD
She then stated that if at any time I looked after her children in return then if the council found out about it then my friend would be in breach - she quoted the case of the two police women and stated "gorden brown backtracked on those statements and you CANNOT have your friend look after your child in her home for ANY kind of reward and reciprocal childcare is reward". She then proceeded to tell me that of the two policewomen one now uses a a child minder and the other a nursery. NO. WHAT HAPPENED WAS EVERYONE JUMPED ON THE POOR WOMEN, WHO CHANGED THEIR CHILDCARE, THEN THERE WAS THE BACKTRACKING AND A STATEMENT WAS ISSUED AND AN AMMENDMENT PASSED SAYING THAT RECIPROCAL CHILDCARE FOR NO PAYMENT WAS ALLOWED AND WASN'T COVERED UNDER OFSTED'S REMIT. YOUR COUNCIL WOMAN IS WRONG.
I am now even MORE confused about childcare.
AM NOT SUPRISED
"This instrument will add a further category of exempt childminding to the 2008 Order:
childminding for the children of friends where this is not provided in return for payment. Payment
is defined in the Order as a payment of money or money?s worth which does not include the
provision of goods or services. This will allow the exemption from registration with Ofsted of
childminding for the children of friends where this is in exchange for goods or services such as
reciprocal childcare, ironing or gardening, but not for payments that could be considered as equivalent to money such as store gift vouchers or the payment of the childminder?s rent or
mortgage."
from here
AM ANNOYED ON YOUR BEHALF - I WAS TOTALLY AGAINST BREAKING THE LAW RE: RECIPROCAL CHILDCARE BUT IT'S CHANGED AND NOW I'M AGAINST OFFICIOUS COUNCIL WORKERS WHO AREN'T UP TO DATE. IT WAS A SILLY RULE. IF YOUR FRIEND WILL DO IT FOR FREE IN HER OWN HOME THEN YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT.
SORRY EVERYONE ELSE