Please or to access all these features

Politics

The New Moscow: A Digital Utopia Doubling as a Surveillance Trap

4 replies

MsAmerica · 22/09/2026 21:53

For me, this is particularly interesting because I've been shocked at the amount of surveillance Londoners have allowed.

The New Moscow: A Digital Utopia Doubling as a Surveillance Trap
Cutting-edge technologies have reshaped the Russian capital, making it safer, more convenient — and more closely watched.
By Ivan Nechepurenko

On the surface, today’s Moscow is a technological wonderland. You can use your face to pay for almost anything, like subway fares, or even to finalize the purchase of an apartment. Robots scurry across sidewalks making 15-minute grocery deliveries, and driverless taxis are set to begin commercial service this year.

Underpinning many of the modern amenities is a robust digital infrastructure developed by the city government that has made life not only easier, but also safer. Policing aided by digital tools has helped cement Moscow’s transformation from the raw, unforgiving place it was 25 years ago, plagued by home burglaries, street muggings and murders.

But there is a cost to the convenience and security: an expanding surveillance state.

Moscow’s roughly 300,000 CCTV cameras make it one of the most heavily watched cities in the world. It is impossible to avoid a lens while simply walking through the city. The same cameras that whisk subway passengers through turnstiles are also used to monitor and flag people....

These databases help the authorities target political dissent in addition to crime. Biometric feeds can be used to hunt down critics of the government after they hold gatherings. The days when outspoken Russians could flee to remote towns to avoid the authorities, as they did during Stalin’s purges, are largely over.

As of July, around 10 million Russians were using biometrics-driven applications in some form, and the Kremlin wants to increase that number, pushing citizens to adopt the tools for identification not only at train stations, but also at airports. This year, Moscow City Hall announced that a biometric system would recognize passengers on buses and trams, automatically deducting their fare once they confirmed the transaction in an app.

Other major European cities also have large CCTV networks, most notably London. Moscow’s, however, is more centralized and uses biometrics to identify people spotted by cameras with fewer restrictions.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/14/world/europe/moscow-russia-putin-digital-surveillance.html

https://www.pressreader.com/usa/the-boston-globe/20260915/281595247428477?srsltid=AU7gw4Vqq8YpVtcD1HXBoJ1IF-D_o2Fpexz6yshm3Wq5xvO1COwu0WjN

OP posts:
PerkingFaintly · 22/09/2026 22:01

Thanks for this. Getting on the thread to read those articles later.Brew

MsAmerica · 22/09/2026 22:03

How nice. Luckily, with this one I was able to find a link without a paywall.

OP posts:
PerkingFaintly · 22/09/2026 22:34

On a similar topic, there's increasing concern in the US about the private surveillance network Flock which has been expanding rapidly.

It's a worst of all worlds: Flock is a private company and sells the data to whoever's willing to pay. That includes state agencies. It also includes other private companies who might be pursuing their own agendas of control.

Since Musk so publicly joined the White House we can't ignore the fact that the tech broligarchy are deeply involved in politics. We also can't ignore their ambitions to gain even more control of the population. Flock data is the sort of thing they're hungry for and will find a lot of uses for – for their benefit, not ours.

Flock says its cameras make US safer - so why are they being sabotaged?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cew9kz1kxpvo

[ETA article title]

A Flock camera in Massachusetts

Flock says its cameras make US safer - so why are they being sabotaged?

The AI-powered cameras have been vandalised across the US, as citizens object to the growing surveillance network.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cew9kz1kxpvo

PerkingFaintly · 22/09/2026 22:42

More about Flock.

Some people have actually read the small print. They're not keen.

Then there are the security technologists who successfully hacked Flock cameras. They're also not keen.

‘Creepy surveillance’: why some cities are shutting down Flock cameras amid privacy concerns
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/apr/06/flock-cameras-privacy-concerns

‘Creepy surveillance’: why some cities are shutting down Flock cameras amid privacy concerns

Some cities are cutting ties with firm that provides license plate reader cameras, others are signing new contracts and many are still looking for their footing

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/apr/06/flock-cameras-privacy-concerns

New posts on this thread. Refresh page