Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Politics

Why nothing on the BBC about the grooming gangs?

143 replies

Tenbywonder · 11/02/2026 23:04

So then, a letter has been sent to the Secretary of State for Justice:

https://forums-images.pistonheads.com/140241/202602117397159

Nothing much has materialised yet in terms of an official UK Government enquiry, but an MP led enquiry has been moving forward at some pace and the emerging details and sheer scale and proliferation of what has happened seems unfathomable. An excerpt from a judge’s sentencing remarks in one such rape gang trial paints a truly disturbing picture:

https://substackcdn.com/image/fetch/$s!AbZo!,f_auto,q_auto:good,fl_progressive:steep/https%3A%2F%2Fsubstack-post-media.s3.amazonaws.com%2Fpublic%2Fimages%2F9af08984-8e32-411b-a677-415f8247a92c_1654x870.png_

So why is what is likely the most far-ranging and sordid scandal in UK modern history, with many 1,000's of abused, drugged and raped young British girls, (mostly underage) getting hardly any attention from our mainstream media?

https://forums-images.pistonheads.com/140241/202602117397159

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
SidekickSylvia · 12/02/2026 15:36

Thanks Ereshkigalangcleg, page 11 is particularly harrowing. Poor 'GH' was only 11 years old, with profoundly disabled parents, which is why they targeted her. For the poster that asked 'Where were their parents?' The men threatened to kill them, and their families if they told their parents. Some of the victims did tell them, despite the threats and then the men would threaten the parents, safe in the knowledge that all authorities involved would look the other way.

Imagine going to the police because your child is being anally gang raped, and the police do nothing other than warn the rapists that you're on to them, resulting in threats of having your house burned down in the night. So what's next, social services? They'll put your child in care because you've failed to safeguard them. Go to the press? They won't touch it because it might ignite racial tensions.

The link above is from 2013, yet this is still happening all over the country and it has been happening for decades. Why isn't it on every news channel and front page of every paper? Why is it allowed to continue?

GreenCandleWax · 12/02/2026 15:41

SidekickSylvia · 12/02/2026 15:36

Thanks Ereshkigalangcleg, page 11 is particularly harrowing. Poor 'GH' was only 11 years old, with profoundly disabled parents, which is why they targeted her. For the poster that asked 'Where were their parents?' The men threatened to kill them, and their families if they told their parents. Some of the victims did tell them, despite the threats and then the men would threaten the parents, safe in the knowledge that all authorities involved would look the other way.

Imagine going to the police because your child is being anally gang raped, and the police do nothing other than warn the rapists that you're on to them, resulting in threats of having your house burned down in the night. So what's next, social services? They'll put your child in care because you've failed to safeguard them. Go to the press? They won't touch it because it might ignite racial tensions.

The link above is from 2013, yet this is still happening all over the country and it has been happening for decades. Why isn't it on every news channel and front page of every paper? Why is it allowed to continue?

Because this country has become a collection of spineless, unprincipled cowards. Heartless and selfish too, more concerned with the shallow and superficial - what someone thinks of them - rather than what is right, to do justly and protect and care for others. That applies not just to those with a professional duty of care (who should hang their heads in shame), but everyyone should look out for the vulnerable.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/02/2026 16:27

SidekickSylvia · 12/02/2026 15:36

Thanks Ereshkigalangcleg, page 11 is particularly harrowing. Poor 'GH' was only 11 years old, with profoundly disabled parents, which is why they targeted her. For the poster that asked 'Where were their parents?' The men threatened to kill them, and their families if they told their parents. Some of the victims did tell them, despite the threats and then the men would threaten the parents, safe in the knowledge that all authorities involved would look the other way.

Imagine going to the police because your child is being anally gang raped, and the police do nothing other than warn the rapists that you're on to them, resulting in threats of having your house burned down in the night. So what's next, social services? They'll put your child in care because you've failed to safeguard them. Go to the press? They won't touch it because it might ignite racial tensions.

The link above is from 2013, yet this is still happening all over the country and it has been happening for decades. Why isn't it on every news channel and front page of every paper? Why is it allowed to continue?

The thought of it is nightmarish, and to think people didn’t think there should be an official inquiry, let alone any unofficial ones.

Tenbywonder · 12/02/2026 16:46

Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/02/2026 16:27

The thought of it is nightmarish, and to think people didn’t think there should be an official inquiry, let alone any unofficial ones.

Keir Starmer didn't want an enquiry. Jess Phillips described it as a 'dog whistle' issue. 350 Labour MP's voted against an enquiry.

But then again, following the Epstein revelations, the Labour cabinet seems stuffed with pedo sympathisers or hangers-on. Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) when the decision not to prosecute Jimmy Saville was made on the grounds of “insufficient evidence”.

Sadly there is a common theme developing here, and at the very least we can safely say that the current government does not care one jot about the safety of children in the UK. At worst, I shudder to think.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/02/2026 16:49

Wasn’t Lucy Powell the dog whistle one? Jess Philips is suspected by some of the victims of trying to water it down/broaden the scope.

Tenbywonder · 12/02/2026 17:05

Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/02/2026 16:49

Wasn’t Lucy Powell the dog whistle one? Jess Philips is suspected by some of the victims of trying to water it down/broaden the scope.

Yeah sorry, that's correct I think.

OP posts:
RafaistheKingofClay · 12/02/2026 17:33

Tenbywonder · 12/02/2026 16:46

Keir Starmer didn't want an enquiry. Jess Phillips described it as a 'dog whistle' issue. 350 Labour MP's voted against an enquiry.

But then again, following the Epstein revelations, the Labour cabinet seems stuffed with pedo sympathisers or hangers-on. Starmer was head of the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) when the decision not to prosecute Jimmy Saville was made on the grounds of “insufficient evidence”.

Sadly there is a common theme developing here, and at the very least we can safely say that the current government does not care one jot about the safety of children in the UK. At worst, I shudder to think.

I’m no fan of Starmer, but this is demonstrably untrue. We have had numerous inquiries into grooming gangs at a regional and national level. Including the large national one, the conclusion of which was that we needed to stop having inquiries and start putting the recommendations of those inquiries into practice. He refused the inquiry on the basis that it would be better to spend time and money preventing the grooming gangs rather than having another inquiry. He did however commission the head of the last national inquiry to look into whether there were aspects that may warrant a further national inquiry. When that report came back suggesting that it would be worthwhile he commissioned one.

Honestly at this point I would stake every pemny I have on Starmer getting the blame for having time and money on having another inquiry when this one comes back with the same recommendation as the previous 27.

Tenbywonder · 12/02/2026 17:47

RafaistheKingofClay · 12/02/2026 17:33

I’m no fan of Starmer, but this is demonstrably untrue. We have had numerous inquiries into grooming gangs at a regional and national level. Including the large national one, the conclusion of which was that we needed to stop having inquiries and start putting the recommendations of those inquiries into practice. He refused the inquiry on the basis that it would be better to spend time and money preventing the grooming gangs rather than having another inquiry. He did however commission the head of the last national inquiry to look into whether there were aspects that may warrant a further national inquiry. When that report came back suggesting that it would be worthwhile he commissioned one.

Honestly at this point I would stake every pemny I have on Starmer getting the blame for having time and money on having another inquiry when this one comes back with the same recommendation as the previous 27.

No it's true I'm afraid. If you knew anything much about the issues then you would know why previous enquiries have fallen way short of the mark and have utterly failed these young girls. So far as I am aware no one in authority covering up, complicit in, and turning a blind eye to this has been arrested or jailed. Ask yourself why not?

Labour party would appear stuffed full of disgusting pedo's, and these are just some of those we know about:

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HA2BOeaWsAAwhMs?format=jpg&name=large

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HA2BOeaWsAAwhMs?format=jpg&name=large

OP posts:
EvangelicalAboutButteredToast · 12/02/2026 17:49

Ballycastle · 11/02/2026 23:44

Also where's the hate for all the UK born groomers? Sickening regardless what gang they're from

That’s called ‘whataboutery’ and deflection.

Ereshkigalangcleg · 12/02/2026 17:58

There has never been a national inquiry into these gangs.

Tenbywonder · 12/02/2026 21:19

Still no interest from the BBC or other mainstream media. But from Rupert Lowe this afternoon:

"Today marks the end of the survivor participation for our rape gang inquiry hearings. I simply have no words that describe the bravery and courage of these women who have come forward. No words. What they have been through is indescribable.

It has been a life-changing experience for me. I never thought such evil was possible. Never. Not here, in Britain. In our towns, in our communities. It is pure evil. These men are so utterly depraved. If it were up to me, thousands of them would receive the death penalty. To do what they did, on such an industrial scale, to innocent young girls - many of whom were already in such an incredibly vulnerable place? There is no redemption possible. The world is a better place without them in it.

I started this inquiry because so many others failed. Speaking honestly, I did not understand how deep this evil is rooted in our society. Police, politicians, council officials, the NHS, social workers, children’s homes - it is everywhere. IS everywhere. Not was. IS.

Meeting these women, and men, listening to how severely they were failed by those tasked to protect them? My views have changed forever. I knew it was bad. I never knew how bad it was. Every single one who has come forward is a hero in my view. The courage and grace in how they have conducted themselves is unlike anything I have seen in my life. All because they don’t want others to suffer the same fate. That is an extraordinary sacrifice. They could have just moved on with their lives. Tried to forget. But no, they chose to do this. I am in awe of all of them.

Our hearings will finish tomorrow, following the contribution of three more expert witnesses. Then the next stage begins. We will produce a report, and then we will seek to put people in prison. There are FAR more testimonies and evidence to release - this will keep coming and coming and coming.

Even with a media blackout, we have reached tens of millions. We have made real progress. And following such immense demand, we will reopen the portal so that more women can tell their stories.

This is just the beginning. Politicians from all parties have failed these girls, again and again and again. I do not intend to join that list.

To everyone who donated, thank you. To our team, thank you. And especially to the survivors, thank you. I believe that together we can start to make Britain understand what is happening, and then finally do something about it."

OP posts:
Parsley4321 · 12/02/2026 22:01

@Changingplace this was seen as a whitewash and bullshit by the survivors no ?

Tenbywonder · 12/02/2026 23:04

Parsley4321 · 12/02/2026 22:01

@Changingplace this was seen as a whitewash and bullshit by the survivors no ?

Yeah totally, skimmed the surface of the issue with barely even lip service paid to the victims, and no acknowledgement of the specific problem, nor the huge nationwide scope of the problem.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/02/2026 00:19

Changingplace · 12/02/2026 21:22

Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs
The Home Secretary's statement on the Independent Inquiry into Grooming Gangs.
From:
Home Office and The Rt Hon Shabana Mahmood MP
Published
9 December 2025

www.gov.uk/government/speeches/independent-inquiry-into-grooming-gangs

Yes, until now. People have claimed there have been multiple ones already.

Imdunfer · 13/02/2026 08:53

The Independent Enquiry cannot be seen to be, and most likely cannot be, independent while ever it is heard by someone at the top of UK politics. Especially not someone from the party that tried so desperately to suppress it.

The obvious answer was a Canadian, Australian, anyone but British or Northern Irish.

Changingplace · 13/02/2026 09:40

Parsley4321 · 12/02/2026 22:01

@Changingplace this was seen as a whitewash and bullshit by the survivors no ?

It was only established in Dec 2025 and hasn’t published anything yet, I fully accept it’s taken far too long to happen and survivors deserve it to have happened sooner but until anything has been released it’s very difficult to judge what the outcomes will be.

The one where virtually all the recommendations weren’t implemented (by the former government) was this independent inquiry;

www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/download/31/independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham-1997-2013-

Parsley4321 · 13/02/2026 09:45

@Changingplace there seems to be alot of paedophile apologists in the Labour Party and Jess Phillips is one of them along side our prime minister so not surprising those girls don’t trust them. Now Lord Ali has been mentioned in the Epstein files

Changingplace · 13/02/2026 09:48

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/02/2026 00:19

Yes, until now. People have claimed there have been multiple ones already.

There’s been this independent inquiry, of which the former government ignored and failed to implement most of the recommendations.

https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/download/31/independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham-1997-2013-

And the outcome from this audit is why the current inquiry is now happening.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-audit-on-group-based-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse

There have been Home Office & Home Affairs reports too - the issue is nobody actually seems to be doing anything off the back of any of the reports, I think the question should be more focussed on why there needs to be more reports, audits and inquiries rather than action.

The one Lowe has just done is the same, nothing will happen from it because it has no power.

Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Exploitation in Rotherham (1997 - 2013) – Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council

We provide local government services to residents, businesses and visitors. Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council: Riverside House, Main Street Rotherham S60 1AE.

https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/download/31/independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham-1997-2013-

Tenbywonder · 13/02/2026 09:53

Changingplace · 13/02/2026 09:48

There’s been this independent inquiry, of which the former government ignored and failed to implement most of the recommendations.

https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/download/31/independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham-1997-2013-

And the outcome from this audit is why the current inquiry is now happening.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-audit-on-group-based-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse

There have been Home Office & Home Affairs reports too - the issue is nobody actually seems to be doing anything off the back of any of the reports, I think the question should be more focussed on why there needs to be more reports, audits and inquiries rather than action.

The one Lowe has just done is the same, nothing will happen from it because it has no power.

And what action exactly do you propose should be taken off the back of the previous enquries?

OP posts:
Bromptotoo · 13/02/2026 10:04

Parsley4321 · 12/02/2026 22:01

@Changingplace this was seen as a whitewash and bullshit by the survivors no ?

The problem seems to be that the survivors do not agree and do not speak with one voice.

Parsley4321 · 13/02/2026 10:14

@Bromptotoo think about what you just wrote ? I’ll give you a clue they are all speaking from different experiences can you not see that

Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/02/2026 10:18

Changingplace · 13/02/2026 09:48

There’s been this independent inquiry, of which the former government ignored and failed to implement most of the recommendations.

https://www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/download/31/independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham-1997-2013-

And the outcome from this audit is why the current inquiry is now happening.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-audit-on-group-based-child-sexual-exploitation-and-abuse

There have been Home Office & Home Affairs reports too - the issue is nobody actually seems to be doing anything off the back of any of the reports, I think the question should be more focussed on why there needs to be more reports, audits and inquiries rather than action.

The one Lowe has just done is the same, nothing will happen from it because it has no power.

My statement is quite correct so I’m not sure why you’re “correcting” me. There has never been a national inquiry focussed on these gangs all over the country until now. Yes there have been local inquiries and inquiries with a broader scope.

Tenbywonder · 13/02/2026 10:19

Bromptotoo · 13/02/2026 10:04

The problem seems to be that the survivors do not agree and do not speak with one voice.

The problem is that the British Establishment has a simple rule:

The problem never is the problem. The problem is people who dare to point out the problem.

Grooming (rape) gangs, illegal immigration, men in women's prisons, net zero, vaccine harms, etc.

Same playbook every time: "racist", "denier", "conspiracy theorist", "nazi".

So many well meaning and caring people vilified by the establishment and their controlled media.

We now seem to live in a society where the golden rule is that you must now tolerate the intolerable, or you'll be made to feel like a pariah for caring about the safety of British women and girls, for wanting a cohesive society, for wanting a strong economy, etc.

Thankfully now, because of brave individuals putting their heads over the top, things are changing and calling someone a "racist" because they don't agree with whatever the heavily promoted Globalist agenda is, no longer seems to work.

OP posts:
Ereshkigalangcleg · 13/02/2026 10:22

Changingplace · 13/02/2026 09:40

It was only established in Dec 2025 and hasn’t published anything yet, I fully accept it’s taken far too long to happen and survivors deserve it to have happened sooner but until anything has been released it’s very difficult to judge what the outcomes will be.

The one where virtually all the recommendations weren’t implemented (by the former government) was this independent inquiry;

www.rotherham.gov.uk/downloads/download/31/independent-inquiry-into-child-sexual-exploitation-in-rotherham-1997-2013-

It was mostly for the Labour Rotherham Council to act on the inquiry into the Labour Rotherham Council. Louise Casey goes into detail about their failings.