Yep.
2020 and 2021 was the warm up, the dress rehearsal. We were made to accept "checking in" when we went anywhere as a new normal.
I'm sure Tony Blair said in 1997 "I want every household to have the internet", back when it was a novelty to have the internet at home. That was step one of mission creep. He had foresight. In 2020, we saw how useful it was to the government (not to us) that almost everyone had the internet at home. Just like Trump talked about tariffs long before anyone thought he might be where he is now.
As for @youalright "Its about paranoia people seem to think everytime something new is announced the government is out to get them." Again, 2020. The year it was thrown into very sharp focus exactly how the government can utilise technology to "keep the public in line" when they see fit. We must TAKE NOTE. Remember that the man who is now prime minister had NOTHING to say against lockdown, and NOTHING to say about the harms our children suffered. His only complaint about lockdown was that it did not go far enough, and that it ever ended: in 2021, he was opposing easing any restrictions all the way. With digital ID, it might have been possible to actually prevent the public buying things they were not supposed to buy, such as Easter eggs. The govt knew most of lockdown was unenforceable, and so did the public (those who resisted the fear porn); but with digital ID, it might have been very different. I'm sure that digital ID will bring a resurgence of the phrase "new normal": new normal to check in everywhere you go, etc.
And I don't trust Farage any more with it either. He might be opposing the idea now, but he's two-faced: after all, there's no requirement for politicians in or out of government to tell the truth. As soon as it suits him, he'll back digital ID to the hilt. If Labour does introduce it, all the flak would be on them, rather than him, and whoever takes up government later can simply inherit it, oven-baked and ready, with no negative publicity at all.
We must keep talking about the negatives of this, in a way in which we were forbidden to talk about the negatives of lockdown while it was happening.