I haven't read all the thread, so - apols if someone else has pointed this out...
It was in the newspapers recently that a survey at the University of Bristol showed that a higher proportion of graduates who had gone to state school and come out with 3 'A' grades, went on to get Firsts, than did ex-independent school pupils who started at Bristol with 3 'A' grades. Fifty four per cent of the state school kids with 3 'A' grades got firsts ( I forget the ex-independent school stats, but there was quite a difference.)
That's good, then, isn't it? Take away all the extra prodding and pushing and polishing and - state school kids are NOT 'worse' - far from it.
God only knows why we have gone back to the 1950s in our political leadership - or indeed, why we have made so little progress generally in getting 'representative' politicians in parliament.
If there was, say, a one-year 'Life in Politics' practical course available and widely known, maybe a broad spectrum of people would apply. It could be a recognised entree for career politicians.
But, to make takeup across a broad spectrum feasible, free higher education would have to be made available to all.
Now, which forward thinking politician would like to work on that?
The country would be eternally grateful.