Theya re introducing a new test for eligibility (was in teh budget)
NAS (National Autistic Society) back me and many otehrs up in our concerns that many will be harmed by these- basc=ically someone comes to your house and assesses you with a checklist for 30 minutes, not a professional usually.
Past experiences with EMA and a simialr system show that many people with invisible disability are competely excluded and have to go to tribual, taking many months and strain.
There is a page on teh NAS website about this.
Take my ds1 as an example; if soeone comes to him and asks him questions such as 'can you pick up that over there' he will fly; however as well as his eating disorders for which he receives weekly treatment, he has an ASD that emans he has attacked family memebrs 6 times since yesterday (end of term) and needs contact 1-1. He can 'put it on' for strangers but within minutes of tehm leaving we are back in two adulst needed territory.
School was a great example of this; evewry eyar he gets a new teacher who reports he is 'cured'; within six weeks we are back to satge one (his statement has just been upped to 50% for this reason).
I also know people with MS who are scared; MS as you probaly know is something that comes and goes.
When tehy did the budget sppeches they talked about DLA being a barrier to working yet DLA is paid alongside work and used to cover the cost of disability. The one they meant I think was EMA- paid to people out of work. A few weeks later they announced changes to that too, and really I do think Osbourne simply hadn't perceived the differences.
Now, I won;rt lose carers as I have a clearly autistic 6 year old as well who attends an SNU, and I get CA for him. However the drop infinances would be enough to eman we lost the house (rented)- becuase we will still get teh costs of the ASD- trashed furniture, special diets, transport to playschemes, having to run 2 cars so DH can get about for work / Uni and yet still be able to access appointments as needed.....
Every person on DLA will be reassessed during 2013. Carer's is dependent on DLA receipt.
And of course the other question is how DLA could be a barrier to working when recipients can be kids? Unless they mean parents, in which case DLA means nothing: stopping it would not, sadly, cure the boys.