DoinItFine what I'm saying is that by baptising a child into a religion you are making that child of a certain religion without it being their choice.
Sure.
But the equivalent of that is not forcing a 5 year old to cover her head.
It's choosing to raise a baby as a Muslim/Jew/Sikh/Buddhist.
The physical impact of Baptism is less than having a bath.
Its importance is spiritual. If you believe in that aspect.
If you don't, it's just words and water.
The equivalent of making a child cover her head in hijab would be forcing little girls to wear mantillas at all times in public.
Is that a thing?
No.
So there's no point in worrying about it.
There are plenty of weird and fucked up things Catholicism does, and I'm more than happy to talk about them.
But unless you take a Dawkinsite position that ALL religious faith is a form of brainwashing and abuse of children, then baptism is just not harmful.
Being forced to cover up your head and wear restrictive clothing is harmful for children.
Or girls, let's be honest. Boys are treated as actual people who count.
The problem with covering little girls is that it is harmful to them. That it restricts them in unacceptable ways.
It is not a spiritual objection. It is about child welfare.