Who's making them wear that instead of their comfy outfit, Blu?
Will their whole community stop speaking to them for wearing baggies? D'you think the leaders of their church, local businesses and their lawgivers will instruct everyone to shun them for not wearing tight dresses? Are they at risk of physical violence because of the Hush Puppies?
I never said I feel sorry for fully covered women. I do feel sorry for anyone who must risk total disgrace if they want to express themselves in non-approved ways.
The business of honour vs. shame is weak in Northern European cultures, as you know. Our morals tend to be based on a sense of justice in the here & now: that which strikes us as unfair or unhelpful is seen as 'bad', to simplify a whole lot. We experience guilt when we're unfair: Islam sees guilt as something much lighter than shame. It is lighter, in that guilt can be assuaged by correcting our unjust actions - an apology, a repayment, a gift, time in prison, etc. Of course we do feel shame, especially as children when friends bully us, but on the whole we see it as inimical to our well-being; it's considered an unhelpful emotion.
Islam sees shame as a tool for control - I've just read some guidance for muslim parents & facilitators to check this; please do correct me if I'm wrong. The fear of shame is drummed into children from a young age. In modern Britain, this is considered abusive. Shame is, indeed, to be feared when it can mean the absolute removal of your support network and even your livelihood. I feel sorry for women, and other classes of people, who are controlled by this.
I'm quite sure I've written very clumsily about this complex issue - it's a whole dissertation when dealing with only one culture! But I hope I've at least managed to hint at why it seems to me so awful when women are shamed into distancing themselves from the society around them.