Mumsnet posters and their issue with a certain MP

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Just in case anyone isnt up to date on this :)

Here is the blog link explaining what happened

Here is one of the many newspaper stories covering it (this one is the telegraph)

Here is the one from the mail, for those who are ok giving them clicks, which includes the extra spicy tidbit of a mn posters real name and occupation

now for the important bit...
Here is the petition

[TwoShakesOfaWhiskersTail]

Signed, how do numptys like this get to be MP's in the first place?
He is an idiotic buffoon.

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Very good point hopalong :)

And thank you, twoshakes

[ChazsBrilliantAttitude]

Maiow
Its good to question the system. Its not good to post confidential legal documents in breach of court orders and to try to silence your critics by intimidation. Is this really the type of person you want fighting a cause?

[ifyourehoppyandyouknowit]

There are proper channels to question things. There are legal ways of campaigning for change.

Then there is posting confidential documents on a parenting forum because you're pissed and trying to be a smart arse.


Seriously, how can people not see the difference? Imagine if it was your person details he was making public in his efforts to try and make a point?

[AndWhenYouGetThere]

signed - We are over 200 now.

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Just curious, those who are signing, are you sharing it on fb/twatter too?

[AnyFucker]

Bump

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Little bump

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Another little bump

[LokiIsMine]

Woah, Beyond good job!! :)

nennypops

Can I steal your post, meaning can I copy it and paste it?

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

[DisplayingBirdOfParadise]

It looks like things are going to change, have you seen the news?

[GoshAnneGorilla]

What

[FrontForward]

What news?

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

??

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Ahh, okay, nicked this from spero elsewhere, I'm sure she wont mind :)

...

Judgments in family cases have been published and freely available for years.

The Daily Mail is not a force for good.

//www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ho0

there are thousands of cases here, covering every aspect of family law decisions, should you ever want to read them.

Strangely, few people ever bother.

they would rather get their information from the Daily Mail.

More fool them.

[DelightedIAm]

//www.theguardian.com/law/2014/jan/16/judge-transparency-family-court-judgments

//www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2540919/At-Victory-secret-courts-Rulings-family-cases-public-Mail-campaign.html

//www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/law-and-order/10578583/Rulings-in-secretive-family-courts-and-Court-of-Protection-to-be-made-public-after-countrys-most-senior-judge-calls-for-greater-transparency.html

They are going to name the professionals involved.

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Thanks for the links.

[LokiIsMine]

Are the professionals happy about this? I didn't see any debate about that. Well, better they name the professionals than the children involved in the cases.

[xtremeraverbaby]

I have signed

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Yep, and the news still makes what JH did illegal, that hasnt changed

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Bump

[BeyondTheLimitsOfAcceptability]

Bumping again. Nearly 300 signatures now! :)

[LokiIsMine]

Beyond,

Why are you all posting "bumping"? Bumping.. What?