Please or to access all these features

Pedants' corner

Lose and loose.

13 replies

User454545454546565 · 09/09/2026 09:02

Saw yet another misplaced 'o' today and was annoyed enough to post on here.

The pronunciation even changes.

Why do people insist on doing this?

Is 'I am loosing all hope' being taught as correct in schools?

OP posts:
Purplecatshopaholic · 09/09/2026 09:06

Oh god, I’m with you op, this drives me nuts, lol.

Twokittenchaos · 09/09/2026 09:15

Yes, very annoying. I’ve noticed it’s rarely the other way, i.e. never “lose” clothing, but often using “loose” to describe being unable to find an item or indeed “loosing” faith.

ProjectFailScary · 09/09/2026 09:16

Agree. It’s annoying.

Westfacing · 09/09/2026 09:21

I'm afraid the problem is a lost cause

It's so prevalent I now just accept that's how it is, otherwise I'd go bonkers!

GlitteryRainbow · 09/09/2026 09:23

I can never tell the difference, so I’m afraid this is a crime I’m guilty of. 🫣

JudyTeeny · 09/09/2026 12:09

My sister in law does this. She also uses of instead of have (could of, would of). Her husband is an English teacher and tried to explain to her why it's wrong, but she didn't understand. She has a degree, so she is educated.

Londonnight · 09/09/2026 12:38

It drives me mad as it means two completely different things. It seems to have become so entrenched now that I can't see it changing.

Aloud is another one that is being used more and more instead of allowed. I have no idea how that ever started, unless you can blame Girls aloud?

Berlinlover · 09/09/2026 14:20

I see this every single day on MN and it annoys me every time.

NeedToKnow101 · 09/09/2026 14:27

I find it incredibly annoying but it’s a mistake made so often and by so many people that I often feel that the spellings should be formally reversed somehow.

TheBlueKoala · 09/09/2026 14:29

Lose loses an o - doesn't mean it's loose.

Dovesono · 09/09/2026 14:30

JudyTeeny · 09/09/2026 12:09

My sister in law does this. She also uses of instead of have (could of, would of). Her husband is an English teacher and tried to explain to her why it's wrong, but she didn't understand. She has a degree, so she is educated.

Even if she doesn't understand it (goodness knows why not; it's hardly rocket science) can she not just learn that it's could/would/should have, not of?

Dovesono · 09/09/2026 14:31

Purplecatshopaholic · 09/09/2026 09:06

Oh god, I’m with you op, this drives me nuts, lol.

I assume you mean lool. 😉

JudyTeeny · 09/09/2026 21:55

Dovesono · 09/09/2026 14:30

Even if she doesn't understand it (goodness knows why not; it's hardly rocket science) can she not just learn that it's could/would/should have, not of?

I'm sure she's capable of understanding and learning the correct terms, but for some reason she won't use them. I think she just doesn't care.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page