Help protect children from gaming harms.

Take our survey

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Which did you find easier: no kids to 1 or 1 to 2?

84 replies

littlepurplerose · 21/01/2023 21:14

Just wondering what you found more challenging & why?

Going from no kids to 1 or going from 1 kid to 2?

(I have 1 and hoping to conceive the next later this year)

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
TheDalaiShawarma · 22/04/2023 12:08

1-2 was way harder for me. 0-1 felt quite easy as newborns nap a lot, I could stay in bed most of the morning feeding, cuddling and napping, stick them in their pram and go shopping or for a walk, park up on the sofa and watch netflix all day whilst feeding and contact napping. Piece of piss.

trying to navigate a toddler on top of a newborn, wrangling both their routines and factoring in nursery pick-ups was overwhelming and exhausting. I hated the early days of having 2.

Velvetbee · 22/04/2023 12:15

0-1 easy, 1-2 dreadful because 1 hated 2, 2-3 was great, 3-4 was a shitshow.

SallyWD · 22/04/2023 12:24

1 to 2 definitely

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Rinkydinkydoodle · 22/04/2023 12:37

One kid to two was a piece of piss in comparison to none to one. Suppose loads of it depends on the children and their personalities but I had PND with DC1 and not with DC2. Think a lot of that was down to knowing what was coming with the birth and the early months, and being less frightened. Also, with experience, more able to anticipate a baby’s needs, so less frustrated/worried.

I’d say we were happier than when I had just the one. Somehow life felt a lot more social and fun, though it was very busy. On reflection it might just have been that I relaxed enough to enjoy it, but either way I’d have had three under five if I’d been able😍

ourflagmeansdeath · 22/04/2023 12:40

1-2 all the way. I was 24 with my first and 30 when I had my second so I was obviously older with more experience by then. And my 2nd was a lot easier than my first because she hardly cried.

Wishona · 22/04/2023 12:42

I found 0-1 a bit of a shock but you only have 1 to think about.

I found 2-3 hardest
Then 1-2
0-1 was easiest

Rinkydinkydoodle · 22/04/2023 12:43

Velvetbee · 22/04/2023 12:15

0-1 easy, 1-2 dreadful because 1 hated 2, 2-3 was great, 3-4 was a shitshow.

This frank summary made me laugh. I have a friend with four kids who said in response to me asking about coping (because I wanted a third but wasn’t sure I could deal) said it’s never Baby Three that’s the problem it’s the fact they’ll have you thinking fuck it let’s have four🤣

Travelisfun · 22/04/2023 13:37

1-2 was so hard.
0-1 was a huge shock but when the baby slept I could watch TV, clean, cook or shower.
When DD2 was born there was never time for that as I spent that time with DD1.
It didn't help that DD2 had silent reflux for the first 6 months and couldn't sleep.
Saying that, I have friends who say that 1-2 was easy for them... I think it largely comes down to how needy both kids are.
I love having two now, they are 15 months apart and can't imagine it any other way

AegonT · 22/04/2023 19:58

0-1 was hell. 1-2 was lovely. But my second daughter was a far far easier baby than her non sleeping, refluxy colicky older sister. If it had been the other way round I would be in for an unpleasant shock.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page