Are your children’s vaccines up to date?

Set a reminder

Please or to access all these features

Parenting

For free parenting resources please check out the Early Years Alliance's Family Corner.

Pinched bottom - not smacking...

67 replies

Mummyinggnome · 19/02/2012 14:30

can I have opinions please?
Dh and I were both smacked as children. No real issues with it in terms of how I view my parents or anything. I imagine on the 3/4 occasions i remember it happening I thoroughly deserved it!
However, I couldn't bear to think of that for my babies. But, sometimes if they've done something shocking (like ds1 squeezing toothpaste over ds3 hair tonight) is it ever permissible to have a pinched bottom and sent to bed before his sisters. When I say pinch, it wasn't hard enough to hurt anything other than his pride.
Am I a shocking mother? Anyone else do this?

OP posts:
Are your children’s vaccines up to date?
Shoopaloop · 19/02/2012 14:31

Sounds grim and abusive.

SparkleSoiree · 19/02/2012 14:31

Pinching/nipping as a form of discipline is not something I have come across before...perhaps someone else has?

eggtimer · 19/02/2012 14:35

Don't see the difference between a smack and a pinch tbh.
Both causing pain / humiliation in response to bad behaviour

Interested in this thread?

Then you might like threads about these subjects:

Shoopaloop · 19/02/2012 14:35

I dont agree with smacking. Pinching seems just as bad if not worse - spiteful.

usualsuspect · 19/02/2012 14:37

Sounds a bit odd to me

KateShmate · 19/02/2012 14:39

I don't really get it...
You 'couldnt bear' to smack your 'babies', but you're happy to pinch them?

EdithWeston · 19/02/2012 14:43

Smacking isn't necessarily about pain and humiliation. In fact, if it hurts, then IMO it's not smacking. It is also used to gain full attention and demonstrate importance of incident (the teaching comes in what you do after the smack, and that's the important part; and the part where you have to be mist careful, as words can so easily be bringers of great humiliation).

If you choose a physical punishment other than smacking (pinch, restraint, insistence on going to /remaining in one spot eg naughty step), you'll probably get similar outcomes. And as long as you're sticking within the law and not hurting your child, and see worthwhile outcomes from your actions, then it is up to you.

But it's not something I would do over toothpaste.

ILoveAFullFridge · 19/02/2012 14:49

I have a Romanian aunt who did something similar - she never smacked her dc, but in situations where my parents might have given me a smack shortage her dc a pinch. I'm about 3y older than those cousins, and I remember vividly disliking what I saw. It seemed sly and nasty, in a way that a smack did not.

I have chosen not to smack or otherwise punish my children physically.

SilentBoob · 19/02/2012 14:50

Why not just kick em in the shins?

CakeMixture · 19/02/2012 14:51

Rather than pinching or smacking hitting your child why not just talk to them.
I never hit my children. I have chosen to communicate with them instead.

ChippingInNeedsCoffee · 19/02/2012 14:53

I'd rather a smack than a pinch. A pinch does (as fullfridge said) seem sly & nasty - a bit light a very tightly gripped wrist and a lot of hissing... just nasty.

ILoveAFullFridge · 19/02/2012 15:19

I disagree that restraint and naughty step-type discipline are physical punishments. Physical punishment is about imposing your will upon someone through brute force or pain. Restraint - gentle restraint - and naughty step can be used as an opportunity to help the child to understand where they went wrong, and what is expected of them.

I never made a conscious decision not to smack my dc, it just developed when I realised that I could not teach by example if I did. I was also afraid of lashing out in a temper...what that might lead to...

I did, however, make a conscious decision never to verbally or emotionally punish my dc by mockery or nasty speaking. It's very difficult, when tempers run high, and those occasions fully justify my commitment to not smacking (or pinching, gripping or shaking).

Toothpaste in the hair does not justify a physical punishment. If one of ours were to do that, they would get a telling-off and would lose all bedtime reading immediately.

ShagOBite · 19/02/2012 15:21

Why would you do this?

Notinmykitchen · 19/02/2012 15:26

I don't see how pinching is any better than smacking, if anything it is worse, they are both things you would not want your children to do. I always thought there was no harm in smacking, as long as it was not hard and for a good reason, I have smacked DS, very gently, twice in his life. I won't be doing it again though, after the second time, he turned to me with hurt eyes and said "You shouldn't hit, Mummy" There is no arguing with that!

FayKnights · 19/02/2012 15:32

Is this for real? You can't stand to smack but you'd pinch? Keep your hands to yourself is my advice.

CakeMixture · 19/02/2012 15:36

I think that pinching as a punishment is maybe something common in other countries/cultures. - not that I think it's ok!

JasperJohns · 19/02/2012 15:40

Good grief.

How spiteful and nasty. What next, a Chinese burn?

No smacking, no pinching. Try proper communication instead.

EdithWeston · 19/02/2012 15:41

"Physical punishment is about imposing your will upon someone through brute force or pain".

I think this is interesting. Smacking isn't painful, nor is it brutish. Trying to equate smacking with abuse is setting up polarising straw men. Especially if you ignore the fact that physical force is required to restrain, as you are using your size/power to enforce your dominant position. "Gentle" restraint is still physical dominance, and requires (unlike smacking) the child to be rendered powerless (and humiliated) for far longer. It's not something I would ever contemplate as a regular method of control for an NT child.

EdnaClouds · 19/02/2012 15:44

Smacking isn't painful?! How ridiculous, of course it is. Shall I come round and give you a few smacks? See how much you like it?

BluddyMoFo · 19/02/2012 15:46

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EdithWeston · 19/02/2012 15:50

The way I smack isn't painful.

This is, once again, part of the difficulty in discussing this at all.

Adults who lack control such that they are incapable of smacking without pain are of course a different category and perhaps need special consideration.

Magneto · 19/02/2012 15:50

I was smacked often as a child and even occasionally had things thrown at my head (the result of becoming too big to be held still and smacked) but pinching seems incredibly wicked to me, and on a similar note as punching a child. What's next? Are you going to start pulling their hair or shoving them about?

CakeMixture · 19/02/2012 15:54

Edith - if your child hits another/you, do you smack hit him/her as punishment?

Magneto · 19/02/2012 15:54

As for smacking not being painful Hmm how do you know? Have you tried it out on your dh or vice versa to check?

As a child I discovered there were ways of making a smack less painful (cupping your palm slightly for a smack on the hand to lessen the surface area) but that is more difficult if you are talking smacks to the bottom/legs etc as then the only way you can lessen the pain is by dodging the smacks... Which invariably led to more smacking because you dodged the first one.

God I loved my childhood Hmm

CakeMixture · 19/02/2012 15:56

Why bother hitting smacking at all if it isn't painful?
Why not try communicating using words?