I mean vs 'benign neglect'. Can one do benign neglect at that age, or does it just mean 'putting on cBeebies'?
Because my DD is almost three, and on my days home with her I spend pretty much all day actively entertaining her. I do do housework and errands and things as well, but the housework is a constant battle of 'just wait a second DD while I unload the dishwasher and then I'll come play' and actually on some days I end up unloading/reloading the dishwasher in several stages, breaking to help her do something or read her a book or whatever in between. Or I have to make up games that allow her to join in.
DH, by contrast, tends to be on his laptop when looking after her. Not all the time, that's unfair, he also takes her to the park or shopping or gets her involved in helping with some carpentry project, but if he's with her in the evening or gets up with her, he tends to let her just 'be around him', sort of thing. I think it's rude, but I can't ignore the fact that when she's with him, she's much, much more inclined towards independent play because she doesn't expect his undivided attention. So, I don't know.
I'm not complaining, it's just that when there's threads about it's good for children to be bored, etc., I wonder what age people mean. I do try and get DD to play on her own a bit, and to 'stretch' the intervals of independent play, but we're still talking a few minutes at a time. I've always believed that it's better to give young children time rather than stuff, and I'm strict about TV, but have I turned into a helicopter parent without noticing? By this age, should she be more willing to be ignored?