Just found out I have failed one of my MSc assignments - it was bound to happen and can re sit so all not lost (yet!)
Anyway - want to have a huge rant over the feedback. It amounted to ten lines, was told I had used refs that were too old (1884) but I didn't have a ref from 1884 (or even 1984). I did have one from the 1960s but it is one of the most important works in the subject (Piaget and child development.
They say I did not mention a certain area, but in the very next sentence say I was slightly confused in my discussion of the area that I apparently did not mention!
I can't rant to them when I have my feedback meeting as it seems like sour grapes so thought I would do it here. It is not so much to expect to get useful feedback is it???
Stupid tutors - I should clearly have got top marks! ha ha