I am confused...

[MatNanPlus]

Why is it ok to show the faces of Romario Mullings-Sewell, aged two, and his three-month-old brother, Delayno who were reportedly stabbed to death by their mother but not the face of Baby P?

Why can the lodger in the Baby P case be named but not the mother and her boyfriend?

the general consensus seems to be that the ID of Peters murder (I wish people would his name) are with-held to protect the ID of their other children

*murderers

To protect the other children in the "family"

Sorry AF didn't know that Peter was the unfortunate little chaps name.

Well i seriously hope the newest baby has nothing what so ever to do with the monsters involved in her making.

no, Im sorry matnanplus, I didn't mean to get at you

I am just finding it irritating that everywhere you look he is defined as Baby P, like somehow he wasn't a real little boy

I think it makes it worse the "parents" are not ID'd, so the whole "family" are being erased somehow

Not making sense, I know

And to ensure a fair trial for the accused?

Seeker - so what was the surname beginning with W

mat, if you believe the newspapers, she is/had made a bid to have contact with the new baby girl and that was supported by SS

?>?other children, are you sure??

I don't have a link slarty, but I read on another thread (don't ask me which one, there are many) there are 2 older siblings and a baby born after Peter died was murdered

She is very young - can't bear the thought that the poor bloody girl had two older children as well - she was only 17 when Baby P was born - how old was she when she had the earlier two?

seeker, I believe that she was 27, not 17

David Cameron mistakenly said she was 17 on PM's question time, that was then widely misreported

Yes, i did see the story about the baby gorl she gave birth to while on remand that was removed under police escort shortly after.

here is the story in The Sun

I am not surprised at SS sadly