Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

Other subjects

what is the point of a life without children?

139 replies

Mud · 13/02/2007 18:02

having a morbid moement and wondere how i would feel if I didn't have my 3 for some reason as am too old to have any more

from this perspective fo having kids i really dont see what point there would be in going on if i no longer had them and had no chance of having others

which makes me wonder what is the point of life withoug kids?

OP posts:
FioFio · 13/02/2007 19:33

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

Mud · 13/02/2007 19:33

disagree dizzy - the world of finance isn't worth the paper its printed on

OP posts:
Mhamai · 13/02/2007 19:33

Oh Mud I don't want to go on a big psycholgy lecture and bore everyone to tears but basically psychonalsyis is a person in therapy who mainly free associates, the therapist analysis is Freudian in concept, ie you weren't breastfed so you weren't nurtured and I could go on and on but I hope you catch my drift.

morningpaper · 13/02/2007 19:33

But Floatinginspace you could have had a million experiences that would have taught you about yourself: travelling the world, working in a third-world country, losing your loved one to an illness, being a carer for your parents... all these things teach us about life. Parents don't have the monopoly on self-awareness and insight.

Mhamai · 13/02/2007 19:34

ps apols for typos keyboard is jammed.

Mud · 13/02/2007 19:36

mahamai i aske dyou what the quote meant to you not for a definition of psychoanalaysis / psychology / psychobable

OP posts:
FloatingInSpace · 13/02/2007 19:37

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

FioFio · 13/02/2007 19:38

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn

foxinsocks · 13/02/2007 19:39

I agree with morningpaper in the main

DizzyBint · 13/02/2007 19:40

mud- what's your pension invested in then? maybe you've gone ethical?

Mhamai · 13/02/2007 19:42

Oops sorry mud the being a mother thing has my cells fried

What the quote means to me is that we can never honestly say a hundred per cent, how we would have been, as it didn't happen in such a way, or how we will be in the future in such a way. I mean yeah sure I had notions of working in third world countries pre kids but I'm also a very impulsive so and so, I could of easily ended up a drop out hippy in Goa. Point is I don't know and and never will.

foxinsocks · 13/02/2007 19:43

and I still don't see why having children is so 'worthy'

Mud · 13/02/2007 19:46

pepetuation of the species answering the biological imperative to have your genes continue to be passed down
an emotional rounding out enabling you to finally realise what it means to haev someone else more importnat than you someone who you would truly sacrifice for - life, body parts, lifestyle

OP posts:
Mhamai · 13/02/2007 19:46

Maybe I can still be drop out hippy in Goa once the kids are gone!

Mud · 13/02/2007 19:47

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

LoveMyGirls · 13/02/2007 19:49

What i find sad in my own personal experience (before i get jumped on ) is that i was so young when i had my first child that i will never know what I would have been like as an adult without children. I would have liked to experience that, it's something i feel envious of sometimes iyswim I am glad I had my children young as I will spend longer with them (hopefully) and I have more energy etc etc so many reasons but I do wonder what I would have done with my life had I not have had children so young.

I have learnt so much, who knows how much I would have learnt without children though? I may have travelled, gained more work experience etc but who knows it's not the path i have taken I am happy with my life it is too short for regrets i am enjoying life now though it is a struggle sometimes I am looking forward to being older too so that i can have some freedom, enjoy travelling and read lots of books etc

Mhamai · 13/02/2007 19:50

Ok answer this then mud, do you honestly think that by virtue of being a woman you should have children......

There are so many women that should not have kids, ok we were given wombs but sadly some women should but do have children, you only have to look at the horrific cases of abuse and if you want to look after someone well hey there's no shortage of agencies crying out for loving people to care for kids that have been abused or neglected by their mums.

Mhamai · 13/02/2007 19:50

should not have

Issymum · 13/02/2007 19:52

Maybe I'm not mother-material, but much though I love my children and my life would be unbearable if I were to lose them, I don't find it hard to imagine a very different but equally interesting and fulfilling life in which I never had them. Good job too really considering that I spent the first 20 years of my adult life without them and, if all goes to plan, I will probably spend the last 20 years of my adult life still loving them, but looking for intellectual, spiritual and emotional fulfilment elsewhere. Hell, the last thing the DDs would want in their 30s is a mother who found her life empty beyond them.

Heathcliffscathy · 13/02/2007 19:53

extra dimension...of course.

point of living....not for me.

custardo take your point about some people learning compassion through motherhood, but just as many unlearn it, and become rather....well...right wing in a 'look after me and mine way' post children too.

Mud · 13/02/2007 19:55

i think by virute of being a human one should aim to procreate - if not procreate then to raise a child - if not raise a child then be instrumental in teh raiisng of a child or the caring of another human being -

i think as a yong adult i was hedonistic and self-obsesed and self-absrobed and i am far more acutely aware of my mortality and the value of life and responsibilty of a poisiton in society since being invovled with children

there are always exceptions

OP posts:
Issymum · 13/02/2007 19:56

"answering the biological imperative to have your genes continue to be passed down"

Nope. A quick survey of the quality of my genetic material (numerical dyslexia, a propensity towards senile dementia, a long history of fecklessness and stumpy legs) and rational thought easily surpassed any biological imperative.

Mud · 13/02/2007 19:58

fecklenseness and stumpy legs - well iget your point then rofl

OP posts:
foxinsocks · 13/02/2007 20:01

Mud you said that the 'vast majority of childless people do not 'contrubute to society' in the way that makes them worthy and with point'

but I just don't see that amongst our childless friends

do you know many people without children?

Mhamai · 13/02/2007 20:03

Yeah and maybe we would all like to live in a postman pat village Sorry mud in an ideal world that's dandy but sadly we are not in that world. We are in a world where children in India are left on the street to die, Brazil, Africa, kids in china being aborted because of the one kid rule and God knows I could go on, or how about closer to home where young girls out of lonliness go out to have children because of living in disadvantaged areas and little or no prospects of an education or couples having children to stick plaster a relationship. Having a child does not define happiness.

Swipe left for the next trending thread